0
How did seafloor drilling scientists find evidence to support the seafloor-spreading hypothesis?
dumb question. don't want to write it all
What else can I help you with?
How did seafloor drilling help scientists find the evidence to support the seafloor spreading hypothesis?
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
How did the seafloor drilling help scientist find evidence to support the seafloor-spreading hypothesis?
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
Who was the person that that made a hypothesis of continental drift?
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
Made before scientists can test a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. It is made before scientists conduct experiments or gather data to test whether it is accurate or not. The purpose of testing a hypothesis is to determine if it is supported by evidence and can be considered a valid explanation for the observed phenomenon.
Why is it impossible to hypothesis true?
In science, it is impossible to prove a hypothesis true because new evidence could always arise that contradicts it. However, a hypothesis can be supported by evidence, increasing our confidence in its accuracy. Scientists constantly test and refine hypotheses to improve our understanding of the world.
How do scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis?
Scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis by conducting experiments and collecting data to test its predictions. They analyze the results statistically to assess if the evidence supports the hypothesis or not. If the data consistently contradicts the hypothesis, it is rejected; if it aligns with the predictions, the hypothesis may be accepted or revised accordingly. Peer review and replication of results by other scientists further validate the findings.
Is Venus Earth's twin?
Some scientists have theories and evidence that prove this hypothesis, but there's no way of knowing for sure.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
How is a hypothesis refuted?
A hypothesis is refuted when empirical evidence or experimental results consistently contradict its predictions. This can occur through rigorous testing and observation, where data fails to support the hypothesis' claims. If alternative explanations are more consistent with the evidence, or if the hypothesis cannot be reliably replicated, it is considered refuted. Ultimately, a refuted hypothesis prompts scientists to revise their understanding or develop new hypotheses.
