0
How did seafloor drilling help scientists find the evidence to support the seafloor spreading hypothesis?
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
What else can I help you with?
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
How did research from the Glomar challenge help scientist support the theory of seaflooding spreading?
From Wikipedia: Starting from August 1968, the Glomar Challenger embarked on a year-long scientific expedition, the Deep Sea Drilling Program, criss-crossing the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between South America and Africa and drilling core samples at specific locations. When the age of the samples was determined by paleontological and isotopic dating studies, this provided conclusive evidence for the seafloor spreading hypothesis, and, consequently, for continental drift.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Is the analysis of seafoor sediments evidence of sea-floor spreading?
Not really but sea floor sediments thickness increase with increased distance from spreading centers which is good evidence. Other evidence such as magnetic reversals, temperature, dating methods provide the best evidence of seafloor spreading
Which observation was not instrumental in formulating the hypothesis of sea floor spreading?
One observation that was not instrumental in formulating the hypothesis of sea floor spreading is the distribution of terrestrial fossils across continents. While these fossils provided evidence for continental drift, they did not directly relate to the mechanisms of sea floor spreading, which is primarily supported by observations such as the age of oceanic crust, magnetic stripe patterns on the sea floor, and the presence of mid-ocean ridges.
How did seafloor drilling scientists find evidence to support the seafloor-spreading hypothesis?
dumb question. don't want to write it all
How did the seafloor drilling help scientist find evidence to support the seafloor-spreading hypothesis?
people here are stupid , really the answer is not hi
How is drilling samples evidence of sea floor spreading?
Because people love cats
What three forms of evidence do geologists have of sea floor spreading?
Magnetic Stripes, Drilling Samples, and Molten Material.
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Which was not included in the support for harry hess's hypothesis sea floor spreading?
Granitic strips in the ocean floor ... Novanet
Wegeners hypothesis of continental drift was finally confirmed by?
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
How did research from the Glomar challenge help scientist support the theory of seaflooding spreading?
From Wikipedia: Starting from August 1968, the Glomar Challenger embarked on a year-long scientific expedition, the Deep Sea Drilling Program, criss-crossing the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between South America and Africa and drilling core samples at specific locations. When the age of the samples was determined by paleontological and isotopic dating studies, this provided conclusive evidence for the seafloor spreading hypothesis, and, consequently, for continental drift.
What are 3 things of evidence that scientists have that prove the ocean is spreading?
1) seafloor spreading 2) continental drift 3 i only found 2
Who was the person that that made a hypothesis of continental drift?
It was Alfred Wegener but other scientists did not believe him but he found evidence
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
