answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.

User Avatar

Jermaine Romaguera

Lvl 13
1y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?

they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.


How did southerners claim that the North benefited from slavery?

they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.


How did Southern slaveholders attempt to convince people in the North to support slavery?

The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.


How did southern slaveholders claim the north benefited from slavery?

They pointed out that the North's textile industry depended on southern cotton Well, they didn't really. Northern states didn't really have slavery much at all. Though they did want more political and military power than the south, so they started the civil war. The civil war actually really wasn't just all about freeing the slaves. Actually, freeing the slaves may have been the last thing on their minds.


What are the cons of the Missouri compromise?

Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.


What are pros and cons of arguing?

Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.


Why did North American slaveholders aim to gather Africans of differing backgrounds and languages?

To prevent a revolt against the slaveholders


Was the North for or against slavery?

against slavery and the south was for slavery!! <3


What are the advantages and disadvantages of The Missouri Compromise?

An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.


Why did many Americans oppose abolishing slavery?

Because it benefited the North, They feared that the blacks would take their jobs, and also worried that the end of slavery would cut off the supply of southern cotton for northern textile mills.


Did the north want slavery?

No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery


Did the north fight for slavery?

the north did. the south had slavery, the north did not.