It led Europeans to believe that they were better than Asians and Africans.
Social Darwinism fueled European attitudes of imperialism and racism by promoting the idea of natural selection and survival of the fittest. It justified colonial expansion and exploitation of indigenous peoples as a way to bring progress and civilization. This ideology also reinforced ideas of superiority among Europeans, leading to discriminatory practices and policies.
Social Darwinism is a belief that certain individuals or groups of people are more fit to survive and prosper in society because of their inherent superiority. This concept has been widely discredited as it promotes discrimination, inequality, and justifies harmful social practices. While the explicit ideas of Social Darwinism may not be as prevalent today, its influence can still be seen in discriminatory attitudes and unequal power dynamics in society.
The Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in empire building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accommodations met.
It led Europeans to believe that they were better than Asians and Africans
The europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in emprie building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accomodations met.
Europeans believed they should conquer other lands to help those places become industrialized.
It gave Europeans a reason to treat people in colonies badlyApex
it helps solve social, political, and ecumenical issues. :)
Calvinism and social Darwinism have influenced the US by shaping attitudes towards work ethic, success, and individual responsibility. Calvinist beliefs in predestination and a strong work ethic influence economic practices, while social Darwinism justified inequality and exploitation in the pursuit of progress. These ideologies have both contributed to the US using its resources in a way that prioritizes individual achievement and economic growth.
Social Darwinism.
No, the Progressive reformers did not believe in Social Darwinism. They believed that its competition and conflict were both detrimental to their society.
Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.