answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in empire building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accommodations met.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

18h ago

Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their imperialistic expansion by believing that they were more "fit" and advanced than other cultures. This idea was used to legitimize their colonization and exploitation of other peoples, claiming it was their right as the superior race to rule over others. Social Darwinism also helped Europeans rationalize the concept of "survival of the fittest" in the context of international competition and conflict.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How didi Europeans use Social Darwinism to?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

How can you use the words social Darwinism in a sentence?

Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.


How did nativists use social darwinism?

Nativists used social Darwinism to justify their belief in racial superiority and to argue against immigration, particularly from non-white or non-Western countries. They believed that certain races were biologically inferior and that their assimilation into American society would weaken the nation. Social Darwinism provided a pseudo-scientific justification for their discriminatory views.


How did otto von Bismarck use social darwinism?

Otto von Bismarck used Social Darwinism to justify his policies of strong centralized government and militarism, promoting the idea that only the strongest nations would survive in the competitive global environment. He believed that conflict and competition were natural and necessary processes for national growth and success. Bismarck used Social Darwinism to solidify his control over a unified Germany and to justify his aggressive foreign policies.


What do social darwinism and white man's burden have in common?

Both ideas sought to justify imperialism and colonialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Social Darwinism argued that only the fittest societies would survive, legitimizing the dominance of Western empires. The White Man's Burden similarly justified Western colonization as a moral duty to civilize and uplift non-Western societies.


What was the long-term impact of Social Darwinism for non-Western cultures?

social darwinism is a term scholars use to describe the practice of misapplying rich and the poor as well as the many difference between cultures all over the world

Related questions

How did european use social darwinism to justify empire building?

The europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in emprie building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accomodations met.


What philosophy did Americans use for social progress?

Social Darwinism :)


How can you use the words social Darwinism in a sentence?

Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.


Was the philosophy that Americans with a great deal of money should use it for social progress?

Social Darwinism


What theory did fascists use to support their ideology?

Answer this question…Social Darwinism


What theory did fascist use to support their own ideology?

Answer this question…Social Darwinism


How did nativists use social darwinism?

Nativists used social Darwinism to justify their belief in racial superiority and to argue against immigration, particularly from non-white or non-Western countries. They believed that certain races were biologically inferior and that their assimilation into American society would weaken the nation. Social Darwinism provided a pseudo-scientific justification for their discriminatory views.


What do social darwinism and white man's burden have in common?

Both ideas sought to justify imperialism and colonialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Social Darwinism argued that only the fittest societies would survive, legitimizing the dominance of Western empires. The White Man's Burden similarly justified Western colonization as a moral duty to civilize and uplift non-Western societies.


What was the long-term impact of Social Darwinism for non-Western cultures?

social darwinism is a term scholars use to describe the practice of misapplying rich and the poor as well as the many difference between cultures all over the world


How does Carnegie use the doctrine of social Darwinism to support his argument?

Carnegie used the doctrine of social Darwinism to justify his belief in the "survival of the fittest" in business. He argued that successful industrialists like himself were naturally superior and deserved their wealth, while those who struggled or failed were not fit for success. This belief allowed Carnegie to argue against government intervention or regulation in business, promoting a laissez-faire approach.


Why did Europeans use colonies?

Europeans went through periods of Social-Darwinism, in which they believed Europeans were the dominate race. This caused Europeans to conquer peoples' lands all over the world. They also used to acquire wealth and power and labor by doing so. And at the same time, they were trying to spread Christianity along with other ideas.


Define Social Darwinism How did some imperialists make use of this concept?

Social Darwinism was a belief that certain races or societies were inherently superior to others and that this idea justified the domination of one group over another. Some imperialists used this concept to justify their expansionist policies, arguing that conquering and ruling over "lesser" civilizations was a natural and inevitable outcome of the struggle for survival and progress. They believed that through competition and conquest, the stronger nations would prevail and spread their culture and influence across the globe.