answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

social darwinism is a term scholars use to describe the practice of misapplying rich and the poor as well as the many difference between cultures all over the world

User Avatar

Henry Feeney

Lvl 10
4y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

The long-term impact of Social Darwinism on non-Western cultures included the justification of colonialism and Imperialism by Western powers, leading to exploitation and oppression of indigenous peoples. It also contributed to a sense of cultural superiority among Western societies, perpetuating inequalities and discrimination globally. Additionally, Social Darwinism hampered the development and recognition of non-Western cultures and traditions by promoting the idea of Western dominance and progress.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the long-term impact of Social Darwinism for non-Western cultures?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology
Related questions

What are the ideas of Darwinism and how do they relate to Social Darwinism?

it helps solve social, political, and ecumenical issues. :)


What year did Social Darwinism start?

Social Darwinism emerged in the late 19th century, gaining popularity in the 1870s and 1880s. It was influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and was used to justify various social, political, and economic ideologies.


Define freedom in the Gilded age via Social Darwinism and labor contract?

In the Gilded Age, freedom was often defined through Social Darwinism, which argued that individuals and businesses should compete in a laissez-faire market without government intervention. This idea emphasized individual liberty and limited government regulation. Labor contracts during this period tended to reflect this ideology, often favoring employers and placing the burden of risk and competition on the workers, leading to a lack of security and bargaining power for many laborers.


Did The Progressive believe in Social Darwinism?

No, The Progressive did not believe in Social Darwinism. The magazine was founded on principles of social justice and equality, advocating for progressive social and political reforms.


What did social darwinism discourage-?

Social Darwinism discouraged social welfare programs and government intervention to help the less fortunate, as it viewed poverty and inequality as natural outcomes of nature that should not be tampered with. It promoted the idea that the strong should thrive and the weak should perish in society, leading to a lack of empathy and support for those in need.


What philosophy did Americans use for social progress?

Social Darwinism :)


How can you use the words social Darwinism in a sentence?

Social Darwinism is the belief that certain social groups are more fit for survival and success due to natural selection principles. Some individuals argue that social Darwinism has been used to justify inequalities and discrimination in society.


Was Rudyard Kipling against social Darwinism?

There is some debate about Rudyard Kipling's views on social Darwinism. Some argue that his works may have reflected elements of social Darwinism, while others suggest that he critiqued the idea through his portrayal of characters and societies in his stories. Ultimately, it is not definitive whether Kipling was explicitly against or in favor of social Darwinism.


Who began social Darwinism?

Charlie Brown


What was the importance of William wilberforce?

Social Darwinism


How did social darwinism impact imperialism?

it didnt


How did social darwinism lead into imperialism?

Social Darwinism, which applied Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies, provided a justification for imperialistic actions by suggesting that stronger nations had a right to dominate weaker ones. This ideology reinforced the idea that some races and cultures were superior to others, thus justifying the expansion of empires in the name of progress and civilization. Ultimately, it fueled a sense of superiority and entitlement among imperial powers, driving them to seize territories and resources around the world.