Europeans used science to justify Imperialism through ideas such as Social Darwinism, which argued that certain races and societies were biologically superior to others. They also used anthropology to classify and rank different cultures, providing a framework to justify European domination and colonization of "lesser" societies. Additionally, Europeans used advances in technology and medicine to portray themselves as more advanced and capable of bringing progress and civilization to the "uncivilized" populations they sought to control.
The Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in empire building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accommodations met.
Nationalists used Social Darwinism to justify their beliefs in the superiority of their own nation or race over others. They believed that competition among nations or races would lead to the survival of the fittest, and thus used this theory to support ideas of imperialism, colonization, and discrimination against those deemed inferior.
by the brainby the studiesby the science
Yes, sociology is considered a social science that involves the study of society, human behavior, and social relationships. Sociologists use scientific methods to analyze and interpret social phenomena and patterns.
Psychology is the social science that emphasizes the use of the scientific method more than any other. Its focus is on understanding individual behavior and mental processes through empirical research and experiments.
Infantilization of indigenous peoples
Don't know maybe
Sphere of Influence and Economic Imperialism
The europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in emprie building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accomodations met.
Not a science at all. It's just speculation disguised as serious use of mathematics and statistics in order to justify greed and inequalities -
He used pseudo-science and claimed that Jews were (genetically) a race in order to justify eliminating the Jews.
Nativists in the past have attempted to use pseudo-science to justify their beliefs in racial superiority and discrimination. They leaned on flawed concepts like eugenics and phrenology to support their views and promote policies aimed at restricting immigration and suppressing particular ethnic or racial groups. These misguided attempts to use science to justify discriminatory practices have been widely discredited and criticized by the scientific community.
Lenin argued that people should not speak of imperialism as a policy because the use of the term would imply that imperialism was something that gave capitalism a choice. Thus there was no science to it at all. Lenin argued that imperialism was a natural development that Marx had simply overlooked.
The Europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in empire building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accommodations met.
Rudyard Kipling justified Western imperialism in Asia and Africa through the concept of the "White Man's Burden," suggesting that it was the duty of Western powers to civilize and uplift supposedly 'backward' societies. He argued that imperialism was a noble endeavor, bringing progress, education, and governance to colonized peoples. Kipling also emphasized the supposed racial superiority of Western cultures, portraying colonial rule as beneficial for both the colonizers and the colonized, despite the often exploitative realities of imperialism.
Europeans learned advanced mathematics, particularly algebra, and navigational techniques such as the use of the astrolabe and compass from the Arabs. These skills were crucial for advancements in science, technology, and exploration during the Middle Ages and Renaissance.
Example sentence - We simply could not justify his actions regardless of his excuses.