well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
well in the Shang society i guess it was more like kings and peasant's. Like in the Egyptians they had lower and lower status's of people. The Shang weren't that complicated and they all were more easy to understand their own social rank.
The four broad social classes were: ruling, nobility, peasants, and slaves.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
Social classes- a broad group in society having common economic, culture, or political status
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
It kept the classes the same.
It kept the classes the same.
Prosperity led to another major change in society~the development of social classes
A caste is any of the hereditary social classes of traditional Hindu society. An example of a caste class is the Shudra, who were the unskilled laborers.
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.