I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
no it is not
social economy
The European economy was fundamentally based on the feudal system, which emerged in the Middle Ages. This social structure was characterized by a hierarchy of lords, vassals, and serfs, where land was the primary source of wealth and power. Lords granted land to vassals in exchange for military service and protection, while serfs worked the land and provided agricultural produce. This system created a localized economy that was largely agrarian and dependent on the relationships between different social classes.
Social division of labor is an aspect of division of labor. It shows the social structure of the technical division of tasks, between firms and workers, or between countries or towns, and focuses on exchange markets. A prime example is one where one town is better equipped for creating food, but another is better suited for creating clothes. As these two towns specialize through social division of labor, they find it beneficial to exchange.
Mixed economy included Capitalistic economy and also Socialistic economy. Capitalistic economy for profit earning and socialistic economy for social welfare.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
fd
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
no it is not
The shape that would best represent a diagram of Egypt's social classes would be a triangle. This is because the pharaoh is at the top and then a few nobles underneath then the large amount of workers.
yes
Ancient Egypt had a hierarchical social structure divided into several classes. At the top were the pharaohs, who were considered divine rulers, followed by a class of nobility and priests who managed religious and political affairs. Below them were skilled artisans and merchants, who contributed to the economy through trade and craftsmanship. The lowest classes included farmers and laborers, who worked the land and built monuments, often living in challenging conditions.
Yes, the Aztec economy was based on a division of social classes. At the top were the nobility and priests who controlled resources and land, followed by skilled artisans and traders. At the bottom were commoners and slaves who had limited access to resources and wealth.
There was a clear distinction in the types of jobs done by people from different social classes.
A caste is any of the hereditary social classes of traditional Hindu society. An example of a caste class is the Shudra, who were the unskilled laborers.
The economy was based on harvesting, production and trade of economically valuable products. The politics was based on social aspects. Social classes arose largely from economic status.
Stewart Clegg has written: 'Power in organization theory' 'Class, politics and the economy' -- subject(s): Capitalism, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Social classes, Social classes