fd
yes
The economy was based on harvesting, production and trade of economically valuable products. The politics was based on social aspects. Social classes arose largely from economic status.
the priest and government officials were the most powerful classes. social classes were based upon wealth and power.
Different societies categorize social classes based on various factors such as wealth, occupation, education, and cultural norms. For instance, some societies may have a clear division into upper, middle, and lower classes, while others might recognize more nuanced distinctions, such as caste systems or class stratifications. Additionally, the number and definition of social classes can evolve over time due to economic changes, social movements, and shifts in cultural values. Ultimately, the concept of social class is influenced by historical, geographical, and socio-economic contexts.
It is based on tradition and social stability, favoring obedience to political authority and organized religion.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
I am not very sure, but I think the Egyptians did have economy based on a division of social classes because they had different classes so they probably had different economy.
no it is not
yes
Yes, the Sumerian economy was characterized by a division of social classes. It was structured with a hierarchy that included a ruling elite, priests, skilled craftsmen, and farmers, with each class contributing differently to the economy. The upper classes controlled wealth and resources, while the lower classes often worked the land and provided labor. This stratification allowed for specialized trades and the development of complex economic systems, including trade and agriculture.
Yes, the Aztec economy was based on a division of social classes. At the top were the nobility and priests who controlled resources and land, followed by skilled artisans and traders. At the bottom were commoners and slaves who had limited access to resources and wealth.
The economy was based on harvesting, production and trade of economically valuable products. The politics was based on social aspects. Social classes arose largely from economic status.
The division of society into social classes based on who does or does not own property.
The development of agriculture allowed for the production of surplus food, leading to a division of labor and specialization in tasks. This division of labor created social classes based on roles and access to resources, with some individuals accumulating wealth and power while others became dependent on them for food.
the priest and government officials were the most powerful classes. social classes were based upon wealth and power.
Social stratification is the division of society into categories of rank in a hierarchy of classes (upper/middle/lower) based on criterion or a combination such as race, colour, religion, gender, age, etc.