The West voted for tariffs, so it may have not impacted much.
The Tariff of 1828, often referred to as the "Tariff of Abominations," was largely opposed by the western states, particularly those that relied on exporting agricultural products. While some western interests initially supported tariffs to protect emerging industries, the overall sentiment shifted against the tariff due to its negative impact on trade and rising prices for consumers. Many western politicians and farmers viewed the tariff as favoring northern industrial interests at their expense. Consequently, the west was not a strong supporter of the Tariff of 1828.
The United States' tariff policies favored Northern manufacturers and harmed Southern farmers
Henry Chalmers has written: 'European tariff policies since the war' -- subject(s): Commercial policy, Tariff
The Tariff of 1816 was met with mixed reactions across the United States. People in the Northeast generally supported the tariff as it protected their burgeoning industries from foreign competition. In contrast, those in the South opposed it, arguing that it raised prices on goods they needed and hurt their economy, which relied heavily on agriculture and trade. The West had a more divided stance, with some supporting the tariff for its potential to foster local manufacturing, while others were wary of its impact on their agricultural exports.
Tariff of 1828
Retaliatory.
Congress passed the Morrill Tariff.
Ottavio Delle Donne has written: 'European tariff policies since the world war' -- subject(s): Commercial policy, Tariff
Deep Impact
west and south
The Northwest generally supported the Tariff of 1816 as it protected their growing industries. The South, however, was opposed to the tariff as it increased the cost of imported goods that the region relied on and favored Northern manufacturing.
The North