0
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
The so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoFive good emperors was not a title.
The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (ruled 96-98 AD), Trajan (ruled 98-117), Hadrian (ruled 117-138), Antoninus Pius (ruled 138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (ruled 161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because these men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor) and he thought that this was why they were good rulers. They were good rulers, lived good lives and earned the good-will of the people. Machiavelli also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started and the ruin of the empire commenced. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all were good who succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.'
The famous historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe so-called "five good emperors" got their name from the Italian political writer Machiavelli. He referred to them as such because of their moderate and wise rule.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who are all of the 5 good emperors?
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
Who were the first 5 Roman emperors?
Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero. Known collectively as the Julio-Claudian dynasty.
Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?
_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
What were there 5 of in ANCIENT ROME?
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
What made the 5 good emperors good?
The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. The term five good emperors involve a bias on the part of Machiavelli because not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
What are facts about Galen?
He performed a post mortem on a barbary apeHe was physician to 5 Roman emperors
Who are all of the 5 good emperors?
The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.The so-called fine good emperors of Rome were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius and Marcus Aurelius.
Who were the first 5 Roman emperors?
Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero. Known collectively as the Julio-Claudian dynasty.
Was the roman empire a good or bad thing?
_Bad_Good"> Bad Good1.Caligula (37-41) 1.Nevra (96-98)2.Elagabalus (218-224) 2.Trajan (98-117)3.Commodus (180-192) 3.Hadrian (117-138)4.Nero (54-68) 4.Antoninus Pius (138-161)5.Domitian (81-96) 5.Marcus Aurelius (161-180)
Names of Roman emporers?
if you want the names of the Roman emperors the list is endless. During the period between 27 BC and 395 AD there were 146 emperors. In 395 the western and eastern parts of the empire became separated. The western part lasted until 476 and had 23 more emperors. The eastern part lasted until 1453 and had 94 more emperors. If you want the name of the title of the emperors it was Augustus. After 641 the title of the Empeors of the Easter Roman Empire (which had also been called Byzantine Empire by historians, but not by the Romans) was basileus.
Describe how the Roman Empire changed after the 5 good emperors came into power?
Disputes over rulership brought on civil war, and the influx of Eurasian peoples progressively changed the peoples, leading to the breakdown of the dissolution of the Western Empire.
What is the Roman name for the Greek goddess Dionysus?
Dionysus (Greek) and Liber (Roman) were both known as Bacchus after the 5'th century. They were the Greek and Roman gods of wine and good cheer (not godesses).
What were there 5 of in ANCIENT ROME?
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
What made the 5 good emperors good?
The term five good emperors was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors, which excluded Titus, because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' Machiavelli said that five good emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. The term five good emperors involve a bias on the part of Machiavelli because not all he emperors by birth which preceded the five good emperors were bad The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom."
What is a good clique name for a 5?
Did you mean, "What is a good name for a group of 5?" If so, then I would have to say Fab 5 (for an all-girl group of course), or, you can have the name be a quality that all 5 of you have. I think that would be a good name.
How was inflation in the roman empire started?
The problem of hyperinflation of the Crisis of the Third Century was due to the Roman coins having been debased by subsequent emperors for nearly a century. Emperors reduced the precious metal content of the gold and silver coins to have more of them to finance their expenses. This devalued the currency. In the end there was only a 5% content of gold or silver and the coins became worthless and unusable for transactions and trade.
What defense measure did the Romans use to protect Rome in the period of decline after 5 good emperors?
They built a wall around city to keep out invaders
