Want this question answered?
Today the tribes located in this area are known as the Delware. When the Dutch settled the area they saw the Native Americans living there as possible slaves. They treated them poorly and killed them as well as taking the land. The European view of land ownership was opposite to the Native Americans. The Native American view is that there can't be landownership and that they had a duty to be caretakers of the land. Essentially the two views kept the European settlers from treating the Delware with respect and this affected the relationship between the two groups, so very little trading was done. These were a peaceful farming community when the European settlers arrived with disease, guns, and stealing their lands. The first reservation was located in New Jersey by the 1700's. The idea presented in some history books that Native Americans were happy to see the European settlers or they were violent people is not the truth. The truth is that Native Americans were killed and lands stolen until they were all on reservations by the mid 1800's.
The First Nation's People of Canada felt that no individual owned the land and that humans were all an equally of part of it. Although they demonstrated territorial claims, this was due to the fact that they felt that their ancestral spirits dwelled in these parts.Conversely, the European view was that land could be owned, bought and sold.
The First Nation's People of Canada felt that no individual owned the land and that humans were all an equally of part of it. Although they demonstrated territorial claims, this was due to the fact that they felt that their ancestral spirits dwelled in these parts.Conversely, the European view was that land could be owned, bought and sold.
The natives were angered at what was occurring and also angry that their sacred land was desecrated. The Settlers thought this movement was a God given opportunity to move on in the new world.
European leaders view multiculturalism as:
The people had no concept of land ownership. There was the concept that we are responsible for the land so that it will serve the next 7 generations. This meant not to drain the land to the point where the air is polluted, dust bowls are created, drinkable water becomes difficult to find and whole species become extinct, among other things. Rather the land is left in better shape than how it was found. We only have to look around to get an understanding of how white settlers felt, and for the most part continue to feel about land.
as animals
If you think as settlers as 'civilized' the people they met along the way. Another view would be they cheated and killed the people they met on along the way, stealing land and then using forced, slave labor, to do the ongoing, hard work.
The most important was the status of Texas, which had split from Mexico a decade earlier and was seen as a rebel province by Mexico. The second one, which triggered the conflict was the actual border of Texas, which from the point of view of Mexico was delimited by the Nueces River; from the point of view of Texans it was the Rio Grande River. Skirmishes in this no man's land between Mexican and American troops started the actual conflict.
most likely fear or as adventure
novanet- sacred
They were both. From the Aborigines' point of view, they were invaders, taking aboriginal lands and pillaging their hunting grounds. The definition of a 'settler' is one who settles an area, clearing the land and building residences and farms. For this reason, the Europeans that came to Australia were settlers.