0
The experiment is unethical and probably would not be allowed by today's standards. The biggest problem is the use of deception, which the experiment relies on. The scientist lies to the test subject saying they will be assisting in a 'learning experiment' and that the shocks are genuine, when in actual fact the scientist is experimenting to see their reaction to the instructions.
The scientist also told them at the start that they are free to leave at any time, but once the voltages increased and the test subject was placed under pressure, the scientist would 'prod' them by saying "You have no choice...you MUST do it."
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Milgram experiment caused psychological harm by exposing participants to high levels of stress, anxiety, and guilt due to the pressure to administer what they believed were painful electric shocks to others. The experiment blurred the line between right and wrong, causing participants to struggle with their own moral values and internal conflict. This led to potential long-term emotional distress and feelings of guilt among participants.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoMilgram's experiment was unethical for a number of reasons. Firstly, it used deception, with the participants not being aware of the true nature of the study. Secondly, it didn't give a clear right to withdraw: if participants were hesitant, they were verbally prodded into continuing. Finally, there was some harm to the participants. All of them experienced stress, and one even suffered convulsions.
There have also been questions over the value of the study. Mandel has claimed that it lessens the evil of something like the Holocaust by appearing to take responsibility away from the Nazis.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would the Milgram experiment have worked if the researchers had not used deception Why or why not?
The Milgram experiment likely would not have worked without deception because participants would have been less likely to follow the researcher's instructions to administer increasingly severe shocks if they were aware of the true nature of the study. Deception was used to create a situation where participants felt they had no choice but to follow orders, as they believed they were inflicting real harm.
What was the conclusion reached by Stanley Milgram in his teacher learner experiment?
Under orders, decent human beings will do anything. This experiment shows that people will obey authority figure even when there is no pre-existing relationship between the individual and the person of authority.
Do the insights gained from Milgram's research on obedience outweigh the elements of deception and stress that were forced on its subjects?
While Milgram's research on obedience provided important insights into human behavior, the use of deception and stress on subjects raises ethical concerns. It is essential to consider whether the benefits of the research justify the potential harm caused to participants, and to ensure that future studies prioritize informed consent and minimize harm.
How and why Milgram's research on obedience contributed to our understanding of human behaviour?
Milgram's research on obedience showed that ordinary people could be capable of committing harm to others under authority. This highlighted the power of situational influences on behavior, providing insights into how obedience to authority figures can override moral considerations. Overall, Milgram's work has had a lasting impact on our understanding of human behavior, particularly in terms of social influence and compliance.
Was milgram's study controversial?
Yes, Milgram's study on obedience was controversial because it raised ethical concerns about the psychological harm inflicted on participants. The study showed the extent to which individuals would follow authority figures, even to the point of harming others.
Why was the milgram experiment discontinued in the us?
The Milgram experiment was discontinued as it had a number of ethical issues. The most important one was potential harm to the participants. All participants suffered stress, and one even suffered convulsions. While 84% of participants said afterwards that they were glad to have taken part, that still means 16% were unsatisfied, and the major ethical concerns lead to the experiment not being continued.
What are the ethical concerns in milgrams study?
Some ethical concerns in Milgram's study include deception of participants about the true nature of the study, lack of fully informed consent, potential psychological harm to participants due to the stress and anxiety induced, and the lasting impact on their beliefs about authority figures and obedience. These raise questions about the balance between scientific advancement and the well-being of participants.
What is the most ethical reason for running a simulation rather than dumping actual oil into Lake Michigan?
an experiment should not cause any harm to the natural world *apex Kyah!
Is there harm to the super senseable smells experiment?
no there is no harm is just a simple experiment of diffrent smells
How does the legislation define serious psychological harm?
Legislation typically defines serious psychological harm as severe emotional distress or impairment that significantly affects an individual's ability to function in daily life. It may involve symptoms such as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, or other mental health conditions that require professional intervention. The specific criteria for serious psychological harm can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the context in which it is defined.
Can LSD cause damage?
LSD (assuming it is actually LSD and not another drug like DOM) is very unlikely to cause any physical harm (except from accidents/self-harm while on the drug), though it can negative psychological effects, with the incidence of this harm increasing with increasing doses and frequency of use.
What is a sentence for harm?
He meant no harm with his words, but they still managed to hurt her feelings.
What is the definition of psychological injury?
Psychological injury refers to a psychological condition or psychological harm that is caused by an event that occurred or the act, or the failure to act of an individual. Some examples include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder or a concussion.
What are the six grounds in New South Wales on which a child or young person is deemed to be at risk of harm?
physical harm, neglect, psychological, sexual,
Can vuze exe cause harm to a computer?
No, vuze exe can not cause harm to a computer.
What harm can drug use cause to a community?
what harm can drug use cause to the community
What is noun for harm?
The word 'harm' is both a verb (Please don't harm me.) and a noun (I have caused no harm.)The noun 'harm' is a word for physical injury or material damage; psychological damage or injury; actual or potential ill effects or danger; a word for a thing.
