The Roman Republic never became a Dictatorship. The republic fell and was replaced by 503 year of rule by emperors which was established by Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, in 27 BC. The emperors were absolute rulers.
Julius Caesar had himself appointed dictator for life in 44 BC. However, the term dictator was very different in Roman times. The dictator was an extraordinary officer of state with extraordinary powers who was appointed by senatorial decree to deal with emergencies. Therefore, Caesar's appointment did not amount to dictatorship was we understand it
nowadays.
What was different about Caesar's appointment was that it was as Dictator for Life, a position that no other Roman dictator had ever been offered, it implies a change in the timbre of the office. It was unusual and threatening enough to one group of Senators that it led to Caesar's assassination.
The office of Dictator was always a part of the Roman Republic. It was only granted in emergencies and then only to deal with a crisis. There were many dictators down through the ages. However, at the time of Julius Caesar, the senate granted him the title Dictator for Life, as a means of flattery. Caesar's life didn't last too long after that honor, but it paved the way for the one man rule of the principate.
Why did Rome go from a Republic to a Dictatorship...
gugkm
The government officials of the Roman republic are starting from the top: Consul--top man, two of them Praetor--mainly a judge, but had other duties as well. Number changed over time Quaestor--treasury offiial, number changed over time Aedile--in charge of public works. Number changed over time. Censor--oversaw the rolls of citizenship every five years. Could remove people from the senate, if deemed unworthy. Tribune--plebeian official who had power of veto over everyone except a dictator. Originally two, but grew to ten.
No, Poland is a parliamentary republic.
The Holy Roman Empire had nothing to do with the Romans. It was a medieval institution centred around Germany. The Roman republic became an empire by expansion both before and after the Punic wars.
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
A republic is a country which is not rules by a king (monarchy) prince (principality) or duke (duchy). It can be a democracy, an authoritarian state, a totalitarian state or a dictatorship.
the Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy
Temporary dictatorship
The Roman Republic was a republic fully because it was not ruled by a king or other aristocrats. This is the definition of a republic. That is all you need to be a republic. A republic can be a democracy, an oligarchy or a dictatorship, so long as it is not ruled by a king or other aristocrats.
I'm sorry but i don't know!
The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.The citizens of the Roman republic did not lose their democracy and become ruled by dictators. Their democracy was alive and well (although at the mercy of politics) until the time of Julius Caesar. Before Caesar, all the dictators resigned after their purpose was achieved -- even Sulla resigned. Caesar, however, was the exception and he received his honors and dictatorship from the fawning senate.
It is a Unitary presidential republic.
The government officials of the Roman republic are starting from the top: Consul--top man, two of them Praetor--mainly a judge, but had other duties as well. Number changed over time Quaestor--treasury offiial, number changed over time Aedile--in charge of public works. Number changed over time. Censor--oversaw the rolls of citizenship every five years. Could remove people from the senate, if deemed unworthy. Tribune--plebeian official who had power of veto over everyone except a dictator. Originally two, but grew to ten.
Neither. Spain is a Constitutional Monarchy. However, it acts as a de facto republic in that the King is really only the Head of State and stays out of most political affairs.
They no longer had wanted a republic, They Had A Dictatorship....Senators wanted so much power and influence in the Empire. The emperor had all the political power and also the army was completely loyal with him....
You could call it a Dictatorship as it is ruled by the military.
It is a communist country.
No, Poland is a parliamentary republic.