dont no
No, for instance the Greeks had education/schools.
no an neither did romans
The Romans were Latins.
The Romans were Latins.
For getting good jobs in the future.
1 Million me kitane zero
Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.Some poor Romans did have some education, others did not. It all depended upon how poor they were and if they or their families were concerned about education. Schooling was not free, but despite this, most of the Roman population was literate to an extent.
romans get kindergarden elementry school and secondary school
The egyptians did.
They were interesting to ancient Romans because ancient Romans were cruel and mean
Romans did and I beleive the Greeks did too but I'm not positive
Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.Prasutagus, Boudicca's husband, did not "give in" to the Romans. He was a Roman ally. His coinage shows that he was a Romanized king.