They did not.
The Umayyads had no accepted religious authority, therefore they could not change Islamic Law or strongly influence it. However, under the Umayyad, the role of the Alim (or scholar) came to the fore as the primary source from which Qur'an could learned.
They did not.
The Umayyads had no accepted religious authority, therefore they could not change Islamic Law or strongly influence it. However, under the Umayyad, the role of the Alim (or scholar) came to the fore as the primary source from which Qur'an could learned.
Sunni muslims follow the sunnah of Muhammad (peace be upon him), believed that Muhhammad (PHUH) was the last prophet, and accepted the rule of the umayyads. Shi'a muslims sometimes follow the sunnah (way) of Muhammad (PBUH) but didn't accept the rule of the Umayyads and believed only close friends or relatives of Muhammad (PBUH) should and could rule
Umayyads always controlled shia Muslims and kept Imams of shia in prison or killed them. shia Muslims hated Umayyads and always hided their beliefs to be safe from Umayyads security officers.They don't consider them right.
Sunni Muslims
Non-Revolters, I guess. There is no particular term for those who accepted the imperial right of the Umayyads. The overwhelming majority of Sunni Muslims did, however, while the overwhelming majority of Shiite Muslims did not. The Sunnis who did not necessarily concede the Umayyads the right to rule were the Mawali or non-Arab Muslims who suffered under Umayyad pro-Arab discrimination.
Knowing how people "feel" is difficult to gauge across history. We know that the Mawali (Non-Arab Muslims) approved of the Abbassids because they (unlike the Umayyads) granted equal privileges to Arab Muslims and Mawali. The Shiites quickly became disenchanted with the Abbassids since the Abbassids did not intend to install a Shiite leader at the head of the Caliphate and began to organize in opposition to Abbassid Rule. The remainder of the Muslim community seems relatively unfazed by the change from Umayyads to Abbassids.
no the umayyads ruled damascus as there capital the abbasids took Baghdad as there capital...
The Abbasids took control
because the Umayyads separated themselves from the general islamic populace and surrounded themselves with foreigners.
Umayyads are Muslims, they represented an important Islamic age in which they ruled the Islamic country & their capital was Damascus.at first they were good rulers but then they stopped behaving like proper Muslims and started drinking wine.
661-750 AD
Umayyads are Muslims, they represented an important Islamic age in which they ruled the Islamic country & their capital was Damascus.at first they were good rulers but then they stopped behaving like proper Muslims and started drinking wine.
There is no such group. The Umayyads were supported by the Sunnis because they had temporal power, but the Sunnis never had a requirement that the ruler need be a descendant of the Umayyads; their precondition for having the right to rule was having the power to effectively govern.Perhaps this question confuses the Shiite requirement that a rightful ruler be a descendant of Ali ibn AbuTalib. Ali and the Umayyads were enemies and are in-no-way related.