0
How did the daoists and legalists view the idea of human nature (instincts)?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Daoists believed that human nature was inherently good and aligned with the Tao, advocating for living in harmony with nature and cultivating spontaneous action. Legalists, on the other hand, believed that human nature was inherently selfish and needed to be controlled through strict laws and harsh punishments to maintain order in society.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did legalists believe about human nature?
Legalists believed that human nature was inherently selfish and untrustworthy. They believed that strict laws, harsh punishments, and a strong central authority were necessary to maintain social order and control human behavior.
How did legalists view nature?
Legalists viewed nature as a chaotic force that needed to be controlled and regulated through strict laws and punishments. They believed that human nature was inherently selfish and needed to be controlled by a strong centralized government in order to maintain social order and stability.
How did the legalists' views of human nature contrasts with those of the confucians?
Legalists viewed human nature as inherently selfish and evil, believing that strict laws and punishments were necessary to maintain social order. In contrast, Confucians believed that humans were inherently good and could be guided to moral behavior through education, ritual, and proper role modeling. Confucians emphasized the importance of moral cultivation to create a harmonious society.
What was the Legalist view of human nature?
Legalists believed that human nature was inherently selfish, opportunistic, and prone to corruption. They believed that people needed strong laws and strict punishment to maintain order and prevent chaos within society. Control and enforcement were emphasized over trust and moral values.
How did the legalists' view of human nature contrast with those of confucianists?
Legalists believed that humans were inherently selfish and greedy, needing strict laws and harsh punishments to control their behavior. Confucianists, on the other hand, believed that humans were inherently good and could be guided to their best selves through education and moral example, promoting virtues like benevolence and righteousness.
How did china's legalists and the daoists differ in their views in society?
Legalists and Daoists differ from society by legalists believing that human nature was wicked and if people did good things they will find harmony. And they also believe if they enforce strict laws they will have harmony and if they do wrong they will receive harsh punishment. Doaists believe that each individual will find their own peaceful path and find harmony on their own.
How did the legalists' views of human nature contrasts with those of the confucians?
Legalists viewed human nature as inherently selfish and evil, believing that strict laws and punishments were necessary to maintain social order. In contrast, Confucians believed that humans were inherently good and could be guided to moral behavior through education, ritual, and proper role modeling. Confucians emphasized the importance of moral cultivation to create a harmonious society.
How did the legalists views of human nature contrast with those of the Confucianism?
They both believe that nature is wicked and that people do good if they are forced to do it.
How did the legalists' views of human nature contrast with those of the Confucianism?
They both believe that nature is wicked and that people do good if they are forced to do it.
How did the legalists views of human nature contrast with those of the confucians?
They both believe that nature is wicked and that people do good if they are forced to do it.
What of these statements differentiates Legalism from Daoism?
Legalism believes in having clear laws to control people; Daoism believes nothing can be controlled.
Are there animal spirit in any one?
Yes we all have basic aninal instincts which are incorporated into our spirit when we are reincarnated. Human animals have learnt to add other instincts to their basic nature.
Do ants have a conscience?
Only human beings have conscience or reason. Animals are provided by the mother nature with irrational instincts.
Did the Chicago school explain human behavior in terms of instincts?
No, the Chicago school did not explain human behavior in terms of instincts. Instead, it focused on the social and environmental factors that influence human behavior, such as urbanization, immigration, and social disorganization.
Did Chicago school explained human behavior in terms of instincts?
yes. human instincts explained in terms of instincts, drives, unconscious processes, and other innate characteristics.
Did Jesus have human instincts?
im sure he did, he was a human
Do human lack instincts true or false?
No humans have instincts, but they often ignore them.
