Want this question answered?
During the time of Mexican rule, the economy in California was largely based on ranching and trade. California became a state on September 9, 1850.
Russia was ruled by Tsar Nicholas Romanov II. He had absolute powers and rules with no parliament or advisory. The Russian people had no say in the government and couldn't debate any issues freely. This is why there were two rebellions and revolutions in Russia, during Nicholas' rule.
It ended 300 years of Romanov rule
Czar Nicholas the Second was not prepared to rule a country, he agreed even his teachers agreed. Czar Nicholas came to power during what was the darkest time in Russia History. He and his wife Alix had only one true dream to raise a close knit family. Nicholas and his wife also believed that Nicholas was on the throne because of God's will, therefore we're unwilling to share power with the Duma. Rasputin was also a reason Nicholas was not considered a good czar because it was believed that Rasputin had too much power over the Romanov family.
Yes, the economy flourished under the rule of Augustus. Interest rates were low and business and trade expanded. the standard of living rose for all.
The building of Vatican palace was finished in 1447, during the rule of Nicholas V.
During the time of Mexican rule, the economy in California was largely based on ranching and trade. California became a state on September 9, 1850.
The industry and agriculture were very modernized and developed.
False
Russia
While Tsar Nicholas II was absent from St. Petersburg on visits to the front during WW1, his wife, Tsarina Alexandra, ruled the country heavily influenced by Grigory Rasputin.
The economy thrived as a result of rising trade with Europe and Asia -Apex-
An Autocrat rule of Imperial Russia.
Russia
When Nicholas was young he was tutored by Konstantin Pobedonostsev. Pobedonostsev taught Nicholas that autocracy was the only possible government for imperial Russia. Nicholas took his lessons to heart. When it came to Nicholas' reign (1894-1917) He was suspicious of any change and therefore, until forced to during the 1905 revolution, did not extend political rights of anybody in Russia for fear that his own posistion would be threatened. He had no interest in democracy, and thought an autocratic government was the only one by which to rule.
Nicholas gilman is awesome
false