Trying to maintain a legislative balance between slave and free states eventually led to congressional gridlock, preventing legislation from being passed in any meaningful manner.
It settled most differences over slavery.
To address the conflict over slavery
A successful compromise which drew a clear line in the sand - no slavery North of that line. This kept the peace for thirty years until the admission of the new territories acquired from Mexico. This required a new compromise, and that one did not last. Its provisions served to widen the sectional differences, and brought war closer.
Sectional compromise did not work in 1860 for many reasons. One of them being that this was the time during the great potato famine in Ireland, so the refugees cascaded into the northern states in the 1850's. Therefore, the north had no room. Once the Europeans were in America, they had no desire for the practice of slavery, and the north states were not convinced to compromise over slavery. The new compromise was put out for grabs, but Lincoln rejected it because he would not allow the extension of slavery. Also, the Crittenden Compromise would allow new slave states, but Lincoln would not accept this, either.
It would hardly have pushed slavery out of sight, when the new Fugitive Slave Act drew it to the attention of millions of Northerners who had never taken an interest in it before. A wise effort? We might say a well-meant effort. But the admission of the huge territory of California seriously upset the balance that had been achieved by the Missouri Compromise.
It settled most differences over slavery.
Because of regional differences, especially those concerning the issue of slavery
To address the conflict over slavery
the north banned slavery while the south allowed it
A successful compromise which drew a clear line in the sand - no slavery North of that line. This kept the peace for thirty years until the admission of the new territories acquired from Mexico. This required a new compromise, and that one did not last. Its provisions served to widen the sectional differences, and brought war closer.
Because of regional differences, especially those concerning the issue of slavery
Sectional compromise did not work in 1860 for many reasons. One of them being that this was the time during the great potato famine in Ireland, so the refugees cascaded into the northern states in the 1850's. Therefore, the north had no room. Once the Europeans were in America, they had no desire for the practice of slavery, and the north states were not convinced to compromise over slavery. The new compromise was put out for grabs, but Lincoln rejected it because he would not allow the extension of slavery. Also, the Crittenden Compromise would allow new slave states, but Lincoln would not accept this, either.
There were two Missouri Compromises. The one in 1820 sought to keep the balance of slave states and free states equal in number. Thirty years later, the Missouri Compromise of 1850 attempted to accomplish the same goal and did so. These compromises were necessary as slavery became a tough issue to solve. There were strong sectional differences on slavery, and compromises were required to keep the nation whole and free of armed conflict over the issue.
It would hardly have pushed slavery out of sight, when the new Fugitive Slave Act drew it to the attention of millions of Northerners who had never taken an interest in it before. A wise effort? We might say a well-meant effort. But the admission of the huge territory of California seriously upset the balance that had been achieved by the Missouri Compromise.
Because the newly-elected Lincoln would not agree to any extension of slavery. So the final attempt at compromise failed.
The Missouri Compromise postponed the issue of slavery.
Sectional tensions in the United States in the 1800s were primarily fueled by differences over slavery. As the country expanded westward, debates arose over whether new territories would allow slavery. This ultimately led to the Civil War, which was fought over the issue of slavery and the balance of power between free and slave states.