The Founders thought the power of government could be limited by making the government only make certain laws and have a new president every four years.
Their primary solution was a system of checks and balances where officials were constantly overlooking each other. With so many different opinions, they figured, everything would always be up for debate.
The Constitution does put a limit on the powers of the government, and thus it could be argued that the Founders intended the government to remain very limited. However, it can also be argued that the Founders did not foresee the technological advancements that we have made in our modern age, and thus a change in the age requires a change in how we govern.
good governments get their power from their people!
A limited government has little power but a unlimited government has full power
it went against a belief in a limited government power
Brazil has a limited government. Because the Brazilian leaders do not have unlimited power.
Limited bc their monarchy has little power
The founders of the nation aimed to limit the power of Congress to prevent the emergence of a centralized government that could become tyrannical, similar to the British monarchy they had fought against. They believed in a system of checks and balances, ensuring that no single branch of government could dominate. This cautious approach was reflected in the Constitution, which delineated specific powers and responsibilities for Congress while reserving rights for states and individuals. Ultimately, their goal was to protect individual liberties and maintain a balance of power within the government.
Because ten they would be bossing around.
Because ten they would be bossing around.
It depends which country you are referring to.
power of the state government