It revealed that the poverty could be caused by a flawed economic system, not just by personal irresponsibility.
It revealed that poverty could be caused by a flawed economic system, not just by personal irresponsibility.
;
They already had rivalries over land and resources
yes
it changed the american life because it gave people the opportunity to have jobs after losing them both because of the depression...hoped this helped :)
The reason that american soldiers attitude changed was because they were attacked. Unlike WW1 Korea and Vietnam were they were drawn into the conflict, pearl harbour was a sneak attack on the US, a low blow or cheap shot if you will. This filled americans with anger and made them unite.
repeal of prohibition
how did american indians attitudes about land use change after the europens arrived
no
what accounted for the changes in American attitudes are in the 1970
In the 1920s, consumer attitudes shifted towards embracing more luxury, convenience, and leisure. This era saw a rise in consumerism, as people started valuing material possessions and leisure activities more than before. Additionally, the increased availability of consumer goods and advancements in advertising played a role in shaping these changing attitudes.
it changed
They already had rivalries over land and resources
Cause they want to change there attitudes
They already had rivalries over land and resources
The Great Depression was an important event for the USA and the World. In Europe, the Great Depression led to Hitler and the Nazi party and WWII. In the USA, the Great Depression led to FDR and a change in the way the American people regard their government and the way the American government treats the American people.
well the banks us to not have insurance but now today they doalso now we have welfare and food staps and unemployment insurenceas well as social seurity.
In the 1970's society stopped viewing gay people as mentally ill (for the most part), but attitudes did not significantly start to change until the beginning of the 21st Century.
Rather than eliminating services and cutting spending, it increased social welfare programs