answersLogoWhite

0

The North was in favor of federal rights. The South wanted anarchy, however.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did north feel about states rights?

i dont know you wont answer my question


What key difference between the north and the south led to the civil war?

The Civil War was really all about slavery. The South wanted slavery to continue, and generally the North wanted slavery to end. However, from the South's point of view the Civil War was all about states rights versus federal government rights. The South wanted the states to have more rights and therefore more power than the federal government. The North generally wanted the federal government to have more rights and therefore more power than the states.


What rights do the federal courts have when the laws feel violated to the constitution?

They have the right to complain to like the Supreme Court or Congress.


Do federal prison rights supersede state rights?

do federal prison visitation rights supersede states rights


Why did North Carolina not ratifiy the constitution I know it was because of the bill of rights but why did they feel that way about the Bill of Rights?

North Carolina initially did not ratify the Constitution because it believed that it did not adequately protect individual rights and liberties. They insisted on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights as a safeguard against potential government overreach. Once the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution, North Carolina ratified it in 1789.


Why did thesuthern states secede from the US in 1861?

It was a question of state's rights verses the rights of the federal government. The whole slavery schick was an add-on several years later to bolster support for the north.


Us war between the north and the south?

This was the civil war. It was a battle about state rights against federal rights. The war was brought about from many things but the one that kicked it into action was the issue of slavery.


Why did the federalists argue against inclusion of a bill of rights in the constitutions?

The Federalist didn't want to add the Bill of Rights because they didn't feel it was needed. They didn't feel it was needed because the powers of the Federal Government was specifically listed in the Constitution, and the Federal Government would have no right to intrude on anything not specifically listed. By listing rights in the First Amendment for example, it appears to be granting rights to the people, even though the anti-federalist put it their to simply specify what the Federal Government had no control over. But by doing so, it appeared to be rights that were given to us by the constitution, when those basic rights we're deemed god given or natural rights that transcend government, as listed at the Virginia Convention.


What were Federal rights during the civil rights?

segregation


What were the two principal things about which the north and south quarreled?

As in the American Civil War? Slavery and Federal vs States rights (i.e the role of government)


Why did the beliefs of states rights cause conflict between the north and south?

The belief in states' rights, particularly in the South, stemmed from a desire to maintain autonomy over local governance and resist federal intervention, especially regarding slavery. Southern states argued that the federal government could not dictate their laws or practices, leading to tensions with the North, which supported a stronger federal authority to uphold national unity and civil rights. This ideological divide culminated in conflicts over issues such as the enforcement of federal laws, tariffs, and ultimately, the legality of slavery, contributing to the onset of the Civil War.


How did the southerners feel about the Dred Scott decision?

Many Southerners supported the Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into free territories. They viewed the decision as a victory for states' rights and property rights over federal power.