Want this question answered?
we compare political institutions
different in too many ways
A political model used to compare political opinions is called a political spectrum. This model typically ranges from left to right, representing different ideological positions and beliefs on various political issues.
Religious leaders have enough experience with community services which could serve as their primary knowledge about people's needs. Admitting that it wouldn't compare to other politician's credibility, if we really think about it.. countries thriving in corruption doesn't necessarily need intellectual leaders.. but leaders with a strong moral character; built with dedication and honesty. A religious leader is a man for other people. It might work if he is also a political leader for the people. Not like many politicians.. who are only for themselves.
A political model used to compare political opinions is called political spectrum. It is a way to categorize different political views based on where they fall on a scale from left to right, with left-leaning views typically associated with more progressive or liberal ideologies, and right-leaning views associated with more conservative or traditional ideologies.
(APEX) Two once mighty empires were collapsing because of internal strife and foreign invasions.
The range of opinions (and those with opinions) is a "political spectrum."
After the decline of Byzantine empire, Moscow's most successor person was ivan III. He ruled most of the byzantine as well as russian territories. He also married the niece of the last emperor of the byzantine empire. he also adapted the culture, religion, and the symbol of the byzantine empire. so, it is called as the third rome or compared as the empire of rome.
Democratic
NO!!
they believed in a positive afterlife.
China has a communist state with a single political party, just like North Korea or Cuba. Mexico is a federal presidential republic akin to the United States, Switzerland and other western democracies.