It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement.
The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.
It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement. The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.
Determine whether a president's actions violate the constitution.
Determine whether a president's actions violate the constitution.
. It prevents the president from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
. It prevents the president from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
No, the Constitution makes no provisions against candidacy for President regarding religious affiliation.No. Such a clause would actually be unconstitutional, as it would violate the 1st Amendment.
The Constitution states that the President must either accept or reject a bill.
Lincoln violated the constitution by suspending the writs of Habeas Corpus.
Congress.
Not any more than any other US president may have (at that time); LBJ had congressional approval via the Tonkin Gulf Resolution.
The judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, is responsible for ensuring that laws do not violate the Constitution. They have the authority to review and interpret laws to ensure their constitutionality. Additionally, individual citizens have the right to challenge laws in court if they believe they violate the Constitution.
maybe