It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement.
The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.
The January 1863 Emancipation Proclamation by President Lincoln did not violate the Constitution; however, it did not have any Constitutional basis, which generated criticism from both Southerners and (some) Northerners alike. That this criticism was a new adversity to be dealt with by Lincoln and his supporters is undeniable: it did not, however, deter the North from its march toward victory in any ultimately significant way.
Only Congress has the power to pass laws (legislate). The President can veto bills and can make suggestions as to laws he/she would like to see enacted. The power of the President is to enforce the laws that are already enacted. The Judicial Branch can interpret the laws and can declare laws that violate the Constitution as unconstitutional.
actually this is not a myth it took rights away from immigrantsno it didn't it
The date was February, 1868; the action was the dismissal of Edwin Stanton as Secretary of War.
The Louisiana long arm statute does not apply when the defendant does not have sufficient minimum contacts with Louisiana, meaning their actions or connections to the state are too remote or unrelated to the legal claim. Additionally, it does not apply if exercising jurisdiction would violate traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Furthermore, if the plaintiff's claims arise from activities that occurred outside of Louisiana and the defendant has no ties to the state, the statute may also be inapplicable.
It was violated because it did not say anywhere in the Constitution that the president could buy or sell land, But after much consideration he did make the settlement. The argument can be made that the Louisiana Purchase by President Jefferson was unconstitutional since there are no rights listed for the President to expand the borders of the United States. Supporters of this action however argue that Jefferson was acting as a treaty with France and Spain in the purchase and therefore it was constitutional.
Determine whether a president's actions violate the constitution.
Determine whether a president's actions violate the constitution.
. It prevents the president from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
. It prevents the president from enforcing laws that violate the Constitution.
No, the Constitution makes no provisions against candidacy for President regarding religious affiliation.No. Such a clause would actually be unconstitutional, as it would violate the 1st Amendment.
The Constitution states that the President must either accept or reject a bill.
Lincoln violated the constitution by suspending the writs of Habeas Corpus.
Congress.
Not any more than any other US president may have (at that time); LBJ had congressional approval via the Tonkin Gulf Resolution.
The judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, is responsible for ensuring that laws do not violate the Constitution. They have the authority to review and interpret laws to ensure their constitutionality. Additionally, individual citizens have the right to challenge laws in court if they believe they violate the Constitution.
maybe