The Renaissance brought about a shift in thinking towards individual agency and free will. Shakespeare's works often explored the complexities of human nature and the consequences of personal choices, rather than solely relying on ideas of predestined fate. This shift in perspective encouraged audiences to consider the role of personal agency in shaping destiny.
The Renaissance gave people a feeling of purpose during life on earth, instead of focusing on the afterlife like the medieval times.
thyliketoyourheadoff
because he was a famous artist who touched other peoples Emotion and thoughs
Northumbria, where peoples in monasteries produced ellegant illistratued texts
People decided to settle west to the Pacific Ocean and south to Mexico.
Miley Cyrus' name was Destiny Hope Cyrus. Shy changed it because it didn't fit her and another reason, Destiny is the weird kid on my bus who intentionally try's to get kicked out of school and steals other peoples stuff. Sorry, but, no.
Will Ferrell will arnett will smith william shatner william shakespeare willem dafoe
they both were scientist and both were astronomers and taught that the earth moves around the sun :)
The rise in ocean travel allowed explorers to come into contact with peoples who were very different from known societies.
I don't know just go to the intertet and find peoples number.com and of course Forrest is always mine forever destiny
whites loved jazz. They used African American poetry and combined it with African American influenced music, like jazz.
Manifest Destiny was the belief that it was the United States' destiny and duty to expand its control and influence from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The primary sources attached to this question provide different perspectives on whether Manifest Destiny was justified. The first primary source, a speech given by John L. O'Sullivan in 1845, is in support of Manifest Destiny. O’Sullivan argues that the United States has a right and a duty to expand its control and influence, as the country was founded on the principles of freedom and democracy. He states that it is the United States' "manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." The second primary source, a speech given by Chief Seattle in 1854, is in opposition to Manifest Destiny. Chief Seattle argues that Manifest Destiny is an imperialistic endeavor that will bring destruction and death to the Indigenous peoples of North America. He states that the "White Man” will take their land and resources, and that their culture will be destroyed in the process. It is difficult to determine whether Manifest Destiny was justified, as it depends on the individual's perspective. Some may argue that Manifest Destiny was justified, as it allowed the country to expand its influence and spread democracy throughout the continent. Others may argue that Manifest Destiny was not justified, as it brought destruction and death to Indigenous peoples and their cultures.