Simple progress of the Industrial revolution - eagerly embraced by the North, strongly resisted by the South, secure with their cotton revenues.
Basically money and don't forget the industrial Revolution
Industrial technology brought a paradigm shift on the mining in Nevada. It increased the amount of gold produced since gold was first discovered in 1859, attracting more prospectus and money to the state.
The Mongol and Jin invasions forced a massive southward shift of the Chinese economy away from the Northwestern coal mines, thereby destroying the iron-coal complex which was already undergoing industrial revolution.
slaves
To change your weapon you would use the SHIFT button.
There was a shift from individualized to mass methods of producing goods.
In my view, the principal change in the economy since the 1700s has been the shift from a largely agrarian, rural society to a largely urban, industrial/post-industrial society.
The changes accompanying a shift from an agricultural economy to an industrial one.
shift is industrial economic activities from the core countries to the periphery
It is supposed to change the shift pattern. Normal is for the best fuel economy and power is for best performance
the industrial rev.
Robin Lapthorn Marris has written: 'The economic theory of managerial capitalism' -- subject(s): Mathematical models, Industrial management 'The economics of capital utilisation' -- subject(s): Industrial management, Shift systems 'Multiple shiftwork' -- subject(s): Capital productivity, Industrial management, Shift systems 'The theory and future of the corporate economy and society' -- subject(s): Corporations, Economic conditions, Economic history, Industrial concentration, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries
Industrial technology brought a paradigm shift on the mining in Nevada. It increased the amount of gold produced since gold was first discovered in 1859, attracting more prospectus and money to the state.
slaves
The Mongol and Jin invasions forced a massive southward shift of the Chinese economy away from the Northwestern coal mines, thereby destroying the iron-coal complex which was already undergoing industrial revolution.
The impact of a shift away from State (national government) owned enterprises to a market economy can promote nationalism in any given nation, depending on the reason for the shift. Generally speaking, if the industry(s) affected by the shift have been producing unsatisfactory results, the shift can be seen by optimists as a sign of confidence in free economy economics. Properly communicated to the public and trade unions, the shift should promote a rise in nationalism. Here's why that can happen: * The shift should be seen as a step towards improving the performance of the new free market powered industry. The public should see this as a positive change to help the economy and help produce fair competition; * Nationalism should rise, based on the well documented idea that the government is confident that of success and also confident that the population can be trusted to respond in a positive manner to the change; and * The shift should be so structured that the stock of the "new" industry, say an airline, should have a high capitalization, allowing the public to buy shares at a low price. This can enable citizens to participate in the growth of the new enterprise.
Putting the transmission in "economy" or "power" mode changes the shift points in the transmission. "Economy" loosens the shift points, allowing the vehicle to obtain better gas mileage at the expense of performance. "Power mode" tightens the shift points, making the vehicle shift more quickly providing better performance at the expense of gas mileage.
If it is on a manual tranny it is the signal for the optimum time for you to shift for best fuel economy.