answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the sophist contribute to knowledge?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

If the first humanist philosophers were concerned with defining what the limits of human knowledge were what were they called?

Sophist


What is a sentence for sophist?

Sophist were the teachers who basically taught philosophy. This is a sentence using the word sophist.


When was sophists born and where?

when was sophist born and wherewhy was sophist important


When did Asterius the Sophist die?

Asterius the Sophist died in 341.


How did microscopes contribute to knowledge about living things?

How did the microscope contribute to knowledge about living things?


Who were the sophist andwhat were their beliefs?

Sophist were Greek Philosophers that believed that there was only a right or wrong


What does democratized knowledge mean?

everyone has equal access knowledge that they can also contribute to.


What can you contribute to the call center company?

i can contribute my knowledge and skills.


Scientist who contribute to your knowledge about cell?

not not


What does a systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge?

what does "systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge" include:


How was socrates a sophist?

Okay, well, my viewpoint is: the reason why one could argue that Socrates was a "common" sophist (being payed for knowledge) is, because he also got payed for his knowledge, more often with (personal) favours than with monay, but he was payed. so far the conventional Sophist. deeper: sophist as in altering his knowledge as to suit what people expect, or being payed for. well, when conquering people with questions that lead to further questions, it is inevitable to keep on questioning and not agreeing on something eventually. so here it is probable that he contradicted his own viewpoint just to prove that another person did not have an answer to this question. secondly, in "Apology" (thats how the text was called that we had in our lecture) he says he will not bring his family into the courtroom, but he mentioned it and that alone already contradicts his "not using his family to gain extra points". that, for now, is the only (possible) explenation i could give :) Greetings


What can you contribute in the call center?

Your expertise and knowledge