The lower status of peasants meant they had limited rights, opportunities, and access to resources. They were often exploited by the nobility and worked long hours in harsh conditions for very little pay. This led to a challenging and difficult daily life, characterized by poverty, substandard living conditions, and a lack of social mobility.
Social stratification can be based on both ascribed status (such as race, gender, and family background) and achieved status (such as education, occupation, and income). Ascribed status is a social position that is given to individuals at birth, with little or no opportunity to change, while achieved status is based on the individual's efforts and abilities. Both types of status can influence a person's position in the social hierarchy.
Social change can positively influence health status by improving access to education, healthcare, and resources for vulnerable populations. Conversely, negative social changes like discrimination, poverty, and environmental degradation can lead to poorer health outcomes and disparities within society. It is important to address social determinants of health to create a more equitable and healthy society.
They are typically known as peasants or rural laborers. These individuals often rely on cottage industries or agricultural labor for their livelihood and are usually part of the lower social strata in traditional societies.
In 1500, social class was based on factors such as birth, wealth, and occupation. Those born into noble or aristocratic families were considered higher class, while peasants and laborers made up the lower class. Wealth and occupation also determined one's social standing, with merchants and professionals sometimes able to rise in status.
Social status consistency refers to the degree to which an individual's positions in social hierarchies align across different domains (e.g., income, education, occupation). A high level of social status consistency indicates that an individual holds similar levels of status across these domains, while a low level of consistency suggests discrepancies in status between different areas of life. This concept is important in understanding social mobility and inequality.
In complete sentences, answer this question: How did the status of government official affect the daily lives of people in this social class?
In complete sentences, answer this question: How did the status of government official affect the daily lives of people in this social class?
They were in the same social class, but were not accorded any social status.
One social factor that can affect tourism is economic status. If people don't have money they don't travel and take vacations.
First you have to eat dounuts
First you have to eat dounuts
It may have affected them in that they didn't feel like they had a chance to change their lives or be more successful. There was no way for them to become noble or rich. That would lead to a lack of hope, at least about that.
peasants were seldom able to change their social status
if people know your social class, they choose to respect you or not. If you are on the top, they think "Oh yeah, he is powerful, i am going to respect him". People tend to want to be friends with people of a higher social class. *Status inconsistency*
Which of these words is a social word? evaluate always non status Status is a word that has to do with social aspects. Someone's status in society can affect their life greatly.
it can it all depends on ur social status to begin with
It affected their lives because religion touched every body Else's daily lives wherever they were in the social pyramid