Want this question answered?
France was divided into one of three social classes or estates
The social structure of France underwent a revolution in 1789. The people overthrew an aristocratic system of government in favor of democratic reforms.
Classes in the Olmec social structure were ordered with the administrators then the engineers and builders then artists which came below the rulers in the rigid Olmec social structure. Farmers formed the society's largest and lowest class.
Kind of complicated and hard to describe. Ancient Israel's social structure consisted of several classes,each of which played a key role in it's growth and development.
well not all people thought it was a good idea but they needed a social pyramid or everyone would be at the same range and level plus it wouldn't make sense if a pharaoh didn't have slaves
France was divided into one of three social classes or estates
france
Russia's social structure was a class structure that included a very powerful ruling class along with a limit on education that caused lower classes to be unable to advance. This social structure was a rigid hierarchy.
The social structure of France underwent a revolution in 1789. The people overthrew an aristocratic system of government in favor of democratic reforms.
The new elite, the middle classes, and the working classes
Instead of nobles and pleasents, a more complex social structure emerged, made up of three classes.
Class structure became more rigid
Classes in the Olmec social structure were ordered with the administrators then the engineers and builders then artists which came below the rulers in the rigid Olmec social structure. Farmers formed the society's largest and lowest class.
Upper, Middle and Lower are an example of social classes.
Peter A. Berger has written: 'Entstrukturierte Klassengesellschaft?' -- subject(s): Equality, Social structure, Social classes
Kind of complicated and hard to describe. Ancient Israel's social structure consisted of several classes,each of which played a key role in it's growth and development.
Basically in social classes by the Aztecs, it was the ruler that came first, then below him were nobles, then were the warriors, and at the bottom were the slaves.