they disagreed because the north didn't need slaves to support their ecoomy; it was based on things other than agriculture. however, the south's economy was totally dependent on slave labor to harvest cotton and other crops in the south. they refused to industrialize, keeping their regions mostly farmland, whereas the north had factories and such that didn't call for slave labor.
Delegates from northern states largely opposed slavery, in the North the practice was not indispensable for ordinary life, the North was largely industrialized, and did not have the massive plantations for which slaves were primarily utilized. This lack of necessity made it easy to take the admirable moral high ground, and denounce slavery. Delegates from the southern states tended to be pro-slavery, for the practice was integral to their entire way of life. Slaves were used on the massive plantations in the South, providing much needed man-power, and basically the muscle in each plantation, doing all of the difficult labor and allowing the owner to make a profit. Its easy to judge, but this was how life was in the South, this was how people made a living, it was regarded as the typical method of making income. The differing views on slavery, its denouncement from the North and total acceptance, even commendation in the South, meant a sense of hostility and "culture clash" that would help ignite the Civil War.
One of the greatest grievances that each side had was the recognition of the slave population in regards to voting power in the legislature. If the population was considered then the southern states would have more sway in placing representatives within congress.
northern had more tax to pay then southern states
Immigrants from northern and western Europe were "superior" to those from southern and Eastern Europe
The Virginia Plan (aka Randolph Plan) for a bicameral US Congress would have benefited "larger" mainly Southern states whose populations (even without counting slaves) exceeded those of smaller Northern states. Both houses would have representation based on population. The Connecticut Compromise gave all states equal representation in the US Senate, and the population of the North, bolstered by immigration, eventually caught up to the South.
delegates at the constitutional convention of 1787 agreed to the three-fiths compromise as a way slaves were counted in determining a state's congressional delegation.
The original 13 colonies had Representatives to sign the Constitution, but only 12 of those colonies had representatives. So the answer is 12 states had people who signed the Constitution.
The Founding Fathers (Delegates to the Philadelphia Convention) did not "establish" racism. Racism has been alive and well in the world since the dawn of time. What they did do is tacitly condone slavery by not writing it out of their new document. From a practical view, thy had no choice. To get their new constitution ratified required the votes of several southern states. The delgates from those states made it clear that they would not vote to ratify a document that did not condone slavery. So it was simply done for political expediency.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.
Probably. Deer in the colder climates tend to have larger body sizes. Even those in northern U. S. states are larger than those in the southern states.
* Northern Hemisphere. * Southern Hemisphere. * Eastern Hemisphere. * Western Hemisphere. Those are the names.
Delegates from northern states largely opposed slavery, in the North the practice was not indispensable for ordinary life, the North was largely industrialized, and did not have the massive plantations for which slaves were primarily utilized. This lack of necessity made it easy to take the admirable moral high ground, and denounce slavery. Delegates from the southern states tended to be pro-slavery, for the practice was integral to their entire way of life. Slaves were used on the massive plantations in the South, providing much needed man-power, and basically the muscle in each plantation, doing all of the difficult labor and allowing the owner to make a profit. Its easy to judge, but this was how life was in the South, this was how people made a living, it was regarded as the typical method of making income. The differing views on slavery, its denouncement from the North and total acceptance, even commendation in the South, meant a sense of hostility and "culture clash" that would help ignite the Civil War.
The North was called the Union because it represented those states that remained in "union" together as the Unites States, and because it was fighting to preserve that union by keeping the rebellious Southern states from leaving it.
Tornadoes in the northern hemisphere rotate counterclockwise while those in the southern hemisphere rotate clockwise.
We go from Primaries in each state, to delegates that represent those candidates chosen, to the convention and then finally the delegates from those states must officially nominate the candidate, if the delegates agree an indivudal can be nominated by acclamation. From there the individual nominated must formally accept the nomination.
They Represent Northern California. SoCal Represents Southern California
Tropical storms in the northern hemisphere rotate counterclockwise while those in the Southern Hemisphere rotate clockwise.
It affects the Northern part of those states
Yes, those were the cotton states, which formed the Confederacy.
Delegates from northern states largely opposed slavery, in the North the practice was not indispensable for ordinary life, the North was largely industrialized, and did not have the massive plantations for which slaves were primarily utilized. This lack of necessity made it easy to take the admirable moral high ground, and denounce slavery. Delegates from the southern states tended to be pro-slavery, for the practice was integral to their entire way of life. Slaves were used on the massive plantations in the South, providing much needed man-power, and basically the muscle in each plantation, doing all of the difficult labor and allowing the owner to make a profit. Its easy to judge, but this was how life was in the South, this was how people made a living, it was regarded as the typical method of making income. The differing views on slavery, its denouncement from the North and total acceptance, even commendation in the South, meant a sense of hostility and "culture clash" that would help ignite the Civil War.