Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
the fish was so nice that way ok bye bye have a nice day
Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
Those accused of crimes went to a nationwide system of royal courts where punishments and decisions were made by the common law.
Because they are accused of crimes it does not mean they committed those crimes.
People who were accused of crime in the 12th century were NOT treated very well. They had no rights, often were declared guilty before they could prove they weren't, and were hung, put into cells and left to survive, or were drawn and quartered with their heads placed on a pike. I don't know why you think there was an improvement to the Justice system in the 12th century, but read about Edward Longshankes or Edward 1 and the trial of William Wallace. Beheading was a popular thing to do and dispatched the accused with one swoop. London Bridge had heads on it that had been cut off as a warning. People were put in big cages and left there hanging even after they died.
There actions may well be construed as war crimes and should be dealt with by the military.
Another country/ leader that was accused of war crimes was the Peruvian president from South America.
Corrupting youth
Accused can be used as a verb and an adjective. Verb: That man has been accused of many heinous crimes. Adjective: He is an accused killer.
He was accused of stealing horses, theft and robbery, and escaping prison.