How did women's suffrage change politics?

Answer 1

Society has moved further towards altruism and equality.

On the face of it, to many this sounds like a good idea.

Anyone that didn't support it at face value appear evil and so to be supportive of it would make one appear reasonable and kind.

One must consider that too often, history will support this observation, the implementation from many policies has regularly had the unintended consequences of having the opposite affect of the aims being sought.

Individuals within societies want to be thought well of and we have reached a point where to challenge altruism as a solution to create a more enlightened civilization can't even be discussed rationally by most of us.

Addressing inequality in life among some groups have been implemented in ways that have ignored cause and affect results for actions taken. In other words, to act unfairly towards a group that have had the upper hand will address the balance in favour of those that have had it hard.

The most enlightened step towards the most balanced and equal society in history was The American Constitution and The Bill of Rights. Protecting the rights of all individuals and allowing all to pursuit their own happiness as part of an intended limited role of Government was greatness in forward thinking.

Freedom and Liberty can be achieved if the ideas behind these documents are understood. By most, they are not.

Creating policy for how we behave is to step away slowly from these ideals. Only the protection of individuals is required, no legislation is required after that. Socialism has "capitalised" on the injustice towards women and consequently women's political considerations have naturally been more socialist in one form or another. Men have been re educated to know of the previous injustices and have accepted on the whole the same notions that policies must be altruistic in nature. One of the great thinkers against these notions was actually a woman. The mere mention of her name in society today either draws a blank through lack of education or hatred as a figure of evil. I'll have to leave her name until the end.

Arts and Education have become so dependent on Governments that you will not find these institutions challenging the hand that feeds it from existing at all. Too many vested interests are locked in between these institutions that change is highly unlikely until all has collapsed. Such is the case with all great nations.

If you agree that economics is one of the driving forces behind a nation does it make sense to make a political choice without understanding it. The vast majority of colleges and universities teach one form of economics... Keynesian.

Ask yourself if it sounds balanced that a "neutral" religious teacher would be being neutral if he only taught Islam and diminished other religions if they were mentioned at all.

Do you know about Keynes? Do you know about Austrian economics? Are you familiar with actual evidence equally between these two schools of thought?

If you are not, will you now try to understand them?

If you have no intention in doing so can you honestly agree that your political choices come from a rational understanding of economics or are you dismissing economics of not being important enough as a factor in all our lives.

Be open to your logic, do not get emotional and become led by whim. Understand about Objectivism and learn to appreciate the late, great, Ayn Rand.

Be free to choose and make sure you are actually being given a choice.

Answer 2

It did stuff.

Answer 3

love