Short and simple answer is: routers
A little more detail. A router has a routing table. That table tells it about the networks that are connected to it, and where to send IP packets based on their addresses.
So for example, lets make a simple network:
Subnet A: 10.0.0.0/24
Host A: 10.0.0.2
Subnet B: 10.0.1.0/24
Host B: 10.0.1.2
Router
Interface A: 10.0.0.1
Interface B: 10.0.1.1
Interface C: 10.0.2.1 * default route
So, if you are host A, and you want to send data to host B (on a different subnet) you would have to send your data to Interface A on the router. It would see that you are trying to send data to a different subnet then the one you are on, and it would look in its routing table to see if it knows anything about the subnet 10.0.1.0/24.
Since the router is connected to 10.0.1.0/24 on interface B, the router would send the packet out interface B, and it would end up at host B through the magic of switching.
Now, if we needed to send data to say... Google.com (66.102.7.99) the router would see that address, and not know where to send it, since none of its interfaces are connected to that subnet. The router would then send this packet out its default route, which would lead to a router that had more information on other networks it is connected to. This would continue until eventually it would reach a router that had some idea where the 66.102.7 network is, and the packet would eventually end up at google. I say eventually, and it may take several hops to get to google, but the whole process (from your computer to google -- or wherever) normally is done in under 250 milliseconds. (My packets get to google in about 65 milliseconds).
maps are showing different information are placed on top of each other
The importance of combining different data collection techniques balances the strengths and weaknesses of each other. It helps reduce non-sampling error and ensures improvement in data evaluation.
A circle graph (also called pie chart, because the different data representations look like slices of a pie) will represent the data as a portion (percentage) of the whole (a full circle). A bar graph will show absolute values of each data. Both graphs allow you to compare the different data categories to each other (which one is biggest, smallest, etc.)
they are different to each other
Traditional FPS and DBMS both are different from each other. In DBMS there is security of data as well as integrated data while this is not in FPS.
they are different to each other
When you import data into Excel, if it is comma-separated, the comma will determine what goes into each cell, and so be in a different column. Data in different lines in the source, will be put in different rows. If the data is coming from a table the data will go into the same structure. So if it is a table in Word, or data from a table in Access, it will go in the same way. The same would apply for other word processors and databases that data is coming from.
"Each of them has a different perspective on the issue." "All of the data have been collected and analyzed."
This situation is known as "collision" in networking where data packets from different transmissions overlap and cause a conflict resulting in data loss or corruption. Collisions are commonly managed in network protocols like CSMA/CD in Ethernet to ensure smooth data transmission.
No. It would not be symmetric if the data classes were of different widths.
Think of "data" as facts, and "information" as how they relate to each other.
A graph that shows proportions of different parts (of a whole) is a Pie chart.