0
How do archaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Archaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization by analyzing artifacts discovered on sites
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Archaeologists draw conclusions about ancient civilizations by analyzing artifacts, structures, and other remains. They use scientific methods such as carbon dating, DNA analysis, and isotopic analysis to determine the age of the findings. By combining this data with historical records and other evidence, archaeologists can piece together a picture of how the civilization lived, thrived, and interacted with their environment.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThey found bones and artifacts buried underground and read history books to find out what these civilizations did in their time
Wiki User
∙ 11y agothey look at samples, old buildings and artifacts
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoTjey study it
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if Sumerians used slaves?
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
In chapter 15 from canyons what qualifies tibbits to examine the skull?
In Chapter 15 of "Canyons," Tibbits is qualified to examine the skull because he is an archaeologist and has experience in studying ancient remains. He also has specialized knowledge in identifying and analyzing bones, allowing him to accurately determine the age and origin of the skull. Additionally, his expertise in the field gives him the necessary skills to draw conclusions about the skull's significance within the story.
What do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?
They compare and contrast the ideas from multiple resources
What strategies do historians use to synthesis evidence and draw conclusions?
Historians use a combination of critical analysis, cross-referencing multiple sources, identifying patterns, and considering various perspectives to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions. They also employ historical context, empathy for historical actors, and theoretical frameworks to interpret the evidence in a meaningful way. Collaboration with other historians and subject matter experts can also help to validate findings and conclusions.
What does you do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?
Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.
How do archaeologist draw conclusions about ancient civilization?
the archaeologlat is the careful uncovering of evidence
How do archaeologists draw about an ancient civilation?
By looking and finding things that have been left behind by the early peoplesArchaeologist draw conclusions about an ancient civilization by analyzing artifacts discovered on sites
What conclusions can we draw from this excerpt about its author Ch?
Without the excerpt provided, it is impossible to draw any conclusions about the author.
Conclusions we draw about a population?
Inferences
What is the best way to determine an implied claim?
Draw conclusions based on details from the reading.
What approach do essayist like Emerson and Thoreau often take to draw conclusions about a subject?
They explore a subject from different angles to draw conclusions.
When do you draw conclusions?
When you think you have found the answer to your question.
What is the last step to do when conducting an experiment?
Draw conclusions
How do you draw conclusions about taxes?
You consult with a tax expert.
Who would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if Sumerians used slaves?
An archaeologist or a historian specializing in ancient civilizations would be most likely to study a stone carving to determine if the Sumerians used slaves. These experts would analyze the content of the carving, as well as historical and archaeological evidence, to draw conclusions about the social structure and labor practices of the Sumerian society.
Is it true that Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusions about the motions of the planets?
As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.
Is 50% size population satisfactory to provide evidence and draw conclusions Justify your answer?
These should be based on some evidence but all to often people draw conclusions based on prejudices.
