pictures and videos
They study it and record it.
An excavation unit is a defined area used by archaeologists to systematically excavate and record archaeological remains. It is typically a square or rectangular section of ground where artifacts, features, and other cultural material are carefully uncovered and documented. This method helps archaeologists understand the context and spatial distribution of archaeological finds within a site.
Yes , but if your employer finds out it will be grounds for termination .
They carefully dig layer by layer they divide the surface of the site into squares with grids as they dig they carefully record the exact location of every object they find.It is from my social studies book.
they have had that record in books and on papper
Specifying the exact location of an artifact allows archaeologists to understand its context within the site, aiding in determining its significance and relationship to other finds. It also helps in creating accurate maps of the site and provides valuable information for future research and analysis.
Archaeologists, geologists and geographers find evidence that tells us of the past. Historians record events that become the past.
Yes. Talk to the doctor about it.
archaeologists have found very shocking evidence. Where do archaeologists work?
One of the most important and difficult jobs of both archaeologists and anthropologists is interpreting and making sense of the artifacts and data they uncover. This involves piecing together fragments of evidence to construct a comprehensive picture of past cultures, societies, and human behavior.
Archaeologists may find artifacts like stone tools, bones of animals that were hunted, and evidence of butchery activities such as cut marks on bones at a kill site. These finds can help researchers understand hunting strategies, diet preferences, and social organization of past human societies.
A:At first, religious texts were used by archaeologists as primary sources because the archaeologists assumed the Bible to be literally true. When they made a discovery that appeared to confirm the biblical account, archaeologists assumed a biblical date for that discovery. When they made a discovery that appeared to create doubt about the biblical account, archaeologists assumed that their own analysis was flawed and so looked for explanations. As the number of archaeological finds that contradicted the Bible continued to mount, archaeologists began to realise that the Bible was not necessarily a reliable historical document and began to rely on it as a secondary source, in other words one that could usefully confirm information from other sources but which could not be relied on in the absence of other sources. Some archaeologists now believe that even as a secondary source, the Bible is not very useful in respect to history.