graphics artists.. the color reproduction is better on a crt then on most low grade lcds... and they are cheaper then the expensive lcds wow the first decent question today.. congrats, everyone else in an idiot
LCDs require less power than CRTs, they also do not flicker.
Plasmas work by lighting up gases in a glass tube. LCDs work by lighting up "liquid" pixels individually.
They are extremely large in comparison to LCD monitors, and they require far more power. So yes, CRTs are typically considered obsolete by today's standards, especially with the introduction of LED LCDs, which have a far better black level and color contrast. LED/LCD monitors also have far greater resolution, since a typical CRT resolution is about 480i, while LED/LCDs can handle resolutions up to 4K. LED/LCDs have much sharper picture, due to higher resolution, and modern LED/LCDs don't have the motion blur problems that earlier LCDs had. These factors make modern LED/LCDs better than CRTs in almost every aspect, and are the cause of CRTs becoming obsolete.
An "LCD" is a Liquid Crystal Display. LCDs are used as parts of computer monitors and as displays in calculators, watches etc.
There are a few glitches with these LCDs rarely. However, they typically work well.
LCDs are much higher resolution.
Owned by RCA, check it out on Wikipedia
lcds are smallerand CRTs are larger in shape crts areprone to flickerand LCDs are free from flicker.because they do not rely on a scaning electron beam
Not noticeably. LCDs are very low-power.
Non- LCDs are much better and cheaper to run!
That is definitely true about CRT monitors. Opening one of them can be deadly and isn't recommended. As far as laptop LCDs, I don't believe they have the same effect. They work in totally different ways. I've opened up at least a dozen LCDs and have never been warned against doing it.