Want this question answered?
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Discard it all.
The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.
The main evidence for the Big Bang is the expansion of the Universe, as seen from the Doppler effect. That is, light from other stars or galaxies changes color depending on the relative velocity to Earth; it turns out that all far-away galaxies are receding from us.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
Hubble constant (galactic red shifts)3K microwave background radiationlight element/isotope ratios (i.e. hydrogen, deuterium, helium, lithium)
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
No
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
edwin hubble