0
ok, a black hole is basically a star that undergoes a supernova, which in term, leaves a massive burned out stellar remnant. With no outward forces to oppose gravitational forces, the remnant will collapse in on itself. The star eventually collapses to the point of zero volume and infinite density, creating what is known as a " singularity ". Around the singularity is a region where the force of gravity is so strong that not even light can escape. Therefore, the gas would be sucked in and who knows what would happen, it would probably be twisted and stretched to the infinate curvature of spacetime in a black hole. : )
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What gases act as greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?
Carbon dioxide (CO2)Methane (CH4)Water vapour (H2O)
Are black holes balach?
i was doing this project for school. here was the info i found. black holes are black because no light can escape. because of that they are invisible. to see a black hole scientists use space telescopes and special tools to look at the stars. stars orbiting black holes act differently than other stars.
What is a black hole in the sky and how does it formed?
There exists variant theories for the existence of Black Holes; one hypothesis has Black Holes being created from the collapsed stellar core of larger than three solar masses, while another has black holes predating stars and forming upon the instance of the Big Bang. In fact, the concept of a star growing or shrinking has little to do with gravitational accretion. So if a Black Hole is just a converted state of stellar evolution, then should we expect that the Black Hole size should be dependent on the amount of material being attracted and annihilated upon its Event Horizon? Per the current consensus, there is not a relevant relationship between the observable size of the accumulated bulge about the Black Hole and the size of the Black Hole itself. And considering the Black Hole radiation jets act as the safety valve for the reactions within a Black Hole, one might speculate that, like a star, the size of the Black Hole has more to do with its internal reactions and less to do with the matter being converted upon its Event Horizon. Still another such theory has their formations predating galaxies and or even predating normal matter itself, existing unto the moment of the Big Bang itself (i.e. unfolding of SpaceTime into a traditional fourth dimensional condition).
How do black holes form in the middle of gallaxies?
That is a very good question, as this relationship is not well known. It is kind of like the conundrum of "which came first, the chicken or the egg." One might view the gravitational influence of the whole Milky Way galaxy as either just a product of its centric 'Black Hole' or as the complete synergistic grouping of all mass within the Milky Way galaxy that induced its centric black hole. Indeed, are errant black holes roaming the universe in search of a nebula to dominate ? or Are black holes induced upon the formation and focus of positive mass density? Note: There exists variant theories for the existence of Black Holes; one hypothesis has Black Holes being created from the collapsed stellar core of larger than three solar masses, while another has black holes predating stars and forming upon the instance of the Big Bang. In fact, the concept of a star growing or shrinking has little to do with gravitational accretion. So if a Black Hole is just a converted state of stellar evolution, then should we expect that the Black Hole size should be dependent on the amount of material being attracted and annihilated upon its Event Horizon? Per the current consensus, there is not a relevant relationship between the observable size of the accumulated bulge about the Black Hole and the size of the Black Hole itself. And considering the Black Hole radiation jets act as the safety valve for the reactions within a Black Hole, one might speculate that, like a star, the size of the Black Hole has more to do with its internal reactions and less to do with the matter being converted upon its Event Horizon. Still another such theory has their formations predating galaxies and or even predating normal matter itself, existing unto the moment of the Big Bang itself (i.e. unfolding of SpaceTime into a traditional fourth dimensional condition).
Can a black hole be destroy?
I'm going to jump in and perhaps contiversially answer this one. Yes. They cannot be destroyed in the traditional sense, ie blown apart, melted, frozen or even annihilated with antimatter but they can 'die' and, indeed, must all eventually disappear. Black holes were once thought to emit nothing of any kind, hence the 'black' part of black holes but, recently, this has been proven false. To completely understand how, a little background on the vacuum of space is needed. Like the black hole, recent theories have changed how we look at the vacuum. It is no longer considered a void of nothingness, it is a sea of particles that spring into existence in negative and positive pairs, exist for a tiny fraction of a second, then annihilate one another. They are called virtual particles and, despite throwing the nature of the universe almost on its head (and just about breaking the first law of thermodynamics), they have been proven to exist and are now a part of mainstream quantum physics. Now, these particles exist as pairs of one positive energy particle, and one negative energy particle. They pop in, are attracted to each other, meet and annihiate. And everyone is happy; they could just about be ignored. But when they come into being near a black hole, it can grab the negative particle before it can destroy itself, pulling it into the event horizon from which there is no escape. The positive particle, counting its blessings and graduating from virtual particle to real particle, escapes the black hole as part of what we call Hawking radiation. And it gives the 'black' hole a healthy little glow. But the negative particle isn't so lucky. the process is extremely complitcated but, with its partner gone and its destruction inside the black hole inevitable, the negative particle also becomes 'real' in a sense. And that sense is its ability to act upon the universe, specifically the black hole. Though there is virtually nothing that can affect a black hole, except to make it larger, the negative energy particle can and it strikes the singularity, disappearing and taking a tiny amount of energy with it. In large black holes, this process is next to negligable. It would take far longer than the lifetime of the universe to destroy even a small black hole. But for the micro ones, this process can be much quicker, and if they can't find a constant stream of matter to replenish their lost energy they will quickly shrink and evaporate. Even in the large ones their fate is sealed; though it will take incredible peroids of time all black holes are destined to evaporate in this manner. That is why I said it was possible to destroy a black hole. The trick is not to attack it, but rather to ignore it. You cant kill a black hole by shoving stuff in, you'lll just make it larger and stronger. But you can destroy a black hole by starving it and, if it was possible to artificially produce these negative energy particles, they might be an effective weapon against an object that was, until recently, thought impervious. There is no known way to destroy a black hole. Stephen Hawking beleives that Black holes will "evaporate" over time, losing mass until there is not enough gravity to maintain the black hole.
Can nuclear weapons kill a black hole?
No. A black hole is a dead star that slowly is gathering anything it can pull. A nuclear weapon would be expected to act on a regular set of rules and situation (surface of a planet.) A nuclear weapon can destroy things coming close to the black hole, but not the black hole itself. The whole reason a black hole is so strong is it is a star that fell into itself - folded inwards likes a moebius strip; launching missiles into the black hole would only 'feed it.' According to our present technology and science, you cannot destroy a black hole, they are already the most 'destroyed' you can be.
What is a black hole and how does it act?
A black hole is formed during a supernova (when a red giant star explodes)--the star collapses in on itself and creates a black hole. Then the black hole can move around or stay in one spot. They suck in everything around them (stars, planets, ect.) There is one black hole in the center of every galaxy. When two black holes come in contact, they create blue and red colors (one black hole is blue and one is red). If i remember correctly, they eventually become one, after circling around each other.
What can act like as a mediums?
it is solids liqiuds and gases
What gases act as greenhouse gases in the atmosphere?
Carbon dioxide (CO2)Methane (CH4)Water vapour (H2O)
Why does ozone hole in antertca?
There is a ozone hole in Antarctica. It is because PSC's act as a base for reactions.
Is the act of hitting a golf ball into the hole?
putt
Are black holes balach?
i was doing this project for school. here was the info i found. black holes are black because no light can escape. because of that they are invisible. to see a black hole scientists use space telescopes and special tools to look at the stars. stars orbiting black holes act differently than other stars.
When do real gases act least like ideal gases?
High temperature and low pressure
What is a black hole in the sky and how does it formed?
There exists variant theories for the existence of Black Holes; one hypothesis has Black Holes being created from the collapsed stellar core of larger than three solar masses, while another has black holes predating stars and forming upon the instance of the Big Bang. In fact, the concept of a star growing or shrinking has little to do with gravitational accretion. So if a Black Hole is just a converted state of stellar evolution, then should we expect that the Black Hole size should be dependent on the amount of material being attracted and annihilated upon its Event Horizon? Per the current consensus, there is not a relevant relationship between the observable size of the accumulated bulge about the Black Hole and the size of the Black Hole itself. And considering the Black Hole radiation jets act as the safety valve for the reactions within a Black Hole, one might speculate that, like a star, the size of the Black Hole has more to do with its internal reactions and less to do with the matter being converted upon its Event Horizon. Still another such theory has their formations predating galaxies and or even predating normal matter itself, existing unto the moment of the Big Bang itself (i.e. unfolding of SpaceTime into a traditional fourth dimensional condition).
Which gases act as signaling molecule in eukaryotes?
ethylene,hydrogen sulphide,CO,NO
How are gases liquids and gases different?
Though both can act as fluids liquids are a different and much cooler state of matter. Gases must first become liquids before they can become solids.
Why did jem act the way he did when he seen the knot hole being plugged?
he wanted to see a duck in the hole so he was mad about it
