You don't change the name on the original deed. You now have a deed from the other grantee in your original deed. Therefore, you have acquired your title to the property in two deeds.
No. A tenant is using the premises with the permission of the owner.
If the tenant damages the property he is liable for such damages. The Landlord may or may not have his own insurance for this purpose but the tenant is liable. If the Tenant has his own insurance (Renter's Insurance) then the Tenant may file a claim and damages will be covered by that insurance.
The simplest way is to execute a quit claim deed. The form is very straight forward and can signed and filed with the courthouse.
He is a muslim called bin laden
i would like too know the answer to this question too except im in California do the laws change
You can have the tenant quit claim their rights to the property. Or sell the life estate to the remainderman.
Usually up to 30 days
I'm no lawyer but... The estate of the deceased tenant should pay any debts before disbursing the money to beneficiaries. The landlord should file a claim against the estate.
Generally, no, unless the landlord has some type of court order or written agreement that bars the former tenant from entering the property. The current tenant has the right to have visitors unless special conditions were mentioned in the written lease agreement.
You haven't explained where he made that claim. No authority is going to "charge" a person simply for making that claim. There is no damage to any party by a person making that claim. Tenants in common each have the right to the use and possession of the whole property. You should consult with an attorney.
In the US, a landlord or co-tenant is not permitted to change the locks because of unpaid rent. Instead, you must file eviction papers with the local court. It can take time, but if you don't follow the law you can be fined. You can sue in small claim's court for back rent.
My organization is currently the Holding Company of four buildings, our tenant is claiming ownership of the buildings because they claim they have been paying the so call mortgage though lease payments. Each lease agreement was signed by both parties, and the tenant agreed to pay the lease amounts and make improvements as needed. The tenant now says that the prior leadership of my organization made statements that my organization was merely a "Holding Company" and that the building would transferred to the tenant. I the prior leadership of my organization did not leave any written document stating the buildings would at one time or another the building would be simply turned over to the tenant. I just their word, against ours, yes, they have file a law suit against my organization. My organization has all the property Titles, and warranty Deeds to support ownership. Can the tenant claim the buildings based on a hear say from a prior director? Thank you..