The mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea.
They provide evidence Pangea existed because mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea. Also that indicate that there were once contiental drift.
Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.
Mountain chains are formed by the action of different tectonic plates drifting into and colliding with each other. When they collide one plate rides over the top of the other creating a mountain or mountain range.
Erratic boulders can provide evidence of a flood because of the distance that is measured from where they were originally placed. This could only be through a strong current of water as they are usually displaced and out of place.
It determines how far the ocean has spread
They provide evidence Pangea existed because mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea. Also that indicate that there were once contiental drift.
The mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea.
Because the earth was thought to be made by god, and it was perfect and no continental crusts. The existence of continental crusts is one of the many evidence that proved Pangaea to be a theory. Also, the existence of the fossil records of the same species along the coastlines of 2 different places confirms Pangea. The current movements in earth's crust also provide evidence that Pangaea could have formed. Most scientists were not given this data and therefore the evidence for Pangaea was vague. Only now has the evidence shown more consistency. Science is skeptical my friend.
The mountain belts along the margins of North America, Africa and Europe line up as well and have similar rock types, indication that the continents at one time were joined as Pangea.
they can leave marks to prove that they have existed
None. Some people point to the Ziggurats of 3rd millennium Mesopotamia and claim them as indicative of the people's ability to build the tower, but ability doesn't provide evidence of performance.
Fossils preserved in sedimentary rocks in mountain ranges can provide evidence of past life forms and environments. Additionally, the presence of folded and faulted rock layers in mountain ranges can indicate tectonic activity and past mountain-building processes. Studying the composition and age of rocks in mountain ranges can also provide insights into the geological history of the region.
Mountain chains are formed by the action of different tectonic plates drifting into and colliding with each other. When they collide one plate rides over the top of the other creating a mountain or mountain range.
Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.
Many of the general population do not know what Pangaea is, but some may. So if you use it, provide an explanation.
i dont now now go ask Google
Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.