Want this question answered?
the modern theory is that all the continents used to be connected (Pangaea). The evidence is that the coastal boundaries fit together like a puzzle piece. another example is that the same species of animals are found on the coasts of the continents that once were touching
A Pangaea plate is a Pangaea plate
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
There are no commonly accepted opposing scientific views on plate tectonics or the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
The theory of Pangaea was that the continents were once together and then were drifted apart due to plate tectonics.
Observations of earthquakes and volcanic activity support the theory of plate tectonics because they both occur on boundaries. Boundaries are where plates meet and either converge, diverge or transform.
No, plate boundaries is part of the explanation of the Plate Tectonic theory:)
The theory of plate tectonics makes the occurrence of Pangaea possible. It suggests that the Earth's lithosphere is divided into several large plates that move and interact with each other over time. In the case of Pangaea, these plates came together to form a supercontinent before breaking apart again.
the modern theory is that all the continents used to be connected (Pangaea). The evidence is that the coastal boundaries fit together like a puzzle piece. another example is that the same species of animals are found on the coasts of the continents that once were touching
because of pangaea
The plate boundaries underneath started the separate Pangaea into seven different continents as well as seven different plates
A Pangaea plate is a Pangaea plate
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
There are no commonly accepted opposing scientific views on plate tectonics or the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea.
The theory of Pangaea was that the continents were once together and then were drifted apart due to plate tectonics.
idont even know