answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

each artifact found tells us more about the past

User Avatar

Rubye Raynor

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago

Recent findings such as new archaeological discoveries, advancements in technology like radiocarbon dating, and interdisciplinary research have allowed for a more accurate understanding of the prehistoric past. These findings have challenged previous assumptions and led to revised interpretations of prehistoric societies, human behavior, and cultural evolution. By constantly building on and refining existing knowledge, researchers can paint a more detailed picture of our ancient past.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do recent findings keep revising knowledge of prehistoric past?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Archaeology

At which level of the dig would an archaeologist expect to find the most recent objects?

Normally this would be near the surface. However other factors can come into play such as re-use of materials from other sites and from earlier times. This is frequently known to occur. In this case there is a need for knowledge which enables cross-referencing with other discoveries. It probably also depends on the amount of disturbance of the site, where older layers may cover more recent, but normally the oldest is on the bottom with the most recent near the top.


What is the time before history was written called?

The time before history was written is called prehistory. It refers to the period before written records were kept and includes the Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age. Archaeology and other scientific methods are used to study prehistoric societies.


How do you interview an archaeologist?

To interview an archaeologist, it's important to research their background and work to ask relevant questions. You can inquire about their fieldwork experience, research interests, methodologies used in excavations, recent discoveries, challenges faced in the field, and the significance of their findings. Additionally, asking about their views on ethical considerations in archaeology and their future research plans can lead to a more insightful conversation.


How does the work of historians and archaeologists help explain why we know more about recent events than ones that occurred earlier?

Historians rely on written records to piece together events from the past, whereas archaeologists study physical remains. The availability and preservation of written records tend to be better for recent events than for earlier ones, leading to more information being known about recent history. Additionally, recent events may have more witnesses or documentation, making them more accessible for study.


What is mauna loas most recent eruption?

Mauna Loa's most recent eruption was in 1984. It started on March 25 and lasted for three weeks.

Related questions

How do recent findings keep revising knowledge of the prehistoric past?

each artifact found tells us more about the past


What are some recent findings in the La Brea Tar Pits?

smilodon and canis dirus


Why should scientist be verey careful when releasing to the world their recent findings?

Yes they should be careful. When such information gets out to the public anything can happen , as people we have opinions and we have thoughts and all that leads to actions taking place so too much knowledge can cause a bad ending. Some people aren't ready for new truths and findings.


Corn became a food crop for Southwestern cultures around?

2100 BC according to recent findings.


Who were the prehistoric ancestors of the Swedish people?

Recent research in DNA and the new remains that have been uncovered in Africa shows that man started in that area of the world. So, the prehistoric ancestors of all mankind came from Africa.


Have humans procreated successfully with another species?

Yes. Recent genetic findings have indicated that Homo Sapiens interbred with Homo Neandertalensis.


Why should scientists be very careful when releasing to the world their recent findings?

The scientists should be careful because when they are releasing their findings if anybody cheat them and publish the finding before the scientist then it will be a great shock for the scientist and we could not know the real person who have found it.


A recent report on the weekly news presented the findings of a study of the effectiveness of onglyza along with diet and exercise for treating disbetes. Identify the implied population?

EVERYONE


In prehistoric times what creatures lived in North Carolina?

Dinosaurs and birds lived in North Carolina in prehistoric times


Can vitamin C affect blood pressure?

recent findings that vitamin C may promote arterial wall thickening seem to contradict these findings, and further long-term studies are needed to assess the full benefits and risks of vitamin C in relation to blood pressure control.


Does Recent studies have linked the drug Cipro to problems with tendons is an example of common knowledge and need not be cited?

If that's a sentence you're writing in a paper, then I see a contradiction. If the studies are recent (and I wouldn't call them that), then they probably aren't "common knowledge" by definition. In addition, and in my opinion, the phrase "recent studies" begs for a citation. "Recent studies" naturally leads to the question, "What studies?" Providing a reference answers that question.


Who are dinasaurs?

Dinosaurs are ancient (prehistoric) creature which roamed the earth for over 200 million years (up to about 70 million years ago.) At one time they were thought to be reptiles like alligators but recent findings indicate that they were more like birds with feathers ( and sometimes hair) and warm blood that laid their eggs in nests and cared for their young after hatching. In fact modern birds are descendants of theropod dinosaurs (like T-Rex)