it doesn't
theory
John Dalton did not have experimental evidence to support his theory of the atom when he proposed it in the early 19th century. His atomic theory was based on observational patterns rather than direct experimental data.
No, a hypothesis is not based on experimental data; rather, it is a proposed explanation or prediction that can be tested through experimentation. It is formulated based on observations, prior knowledge, or existing theories. Once experiments are conducted, the data collected can support or refute the hypothesis. Thus, while a hypothesis guides the experimental process, it is not derived from experimental data itself.
appendices starts with a and experimental data with e
wat are the two ways of presenting experimental data
There is no such experiments yet because of the range of energy which should be used.
i believe it is how valid or accurate the experimental data comes out.
If your data does not support your hypothesis, it means that there is not enough evidence to conclude that your hypothesis is true. In such cases, you may need to reconsider your hypothesis, collect additional data, or revise your experimental approach. It is important to acknowledge and learn from results that do not support your initial hypothesis in order to refine your research and understanding.
Experimental data is an important component of any scientific paper.After looking at the data, we can compare that to our hypothesis and see if it matches to our tentative idea.Analysis of experimental data also helps us to draw a conclusion of an experiment.
What does it mean when a student data that was collected from an experimental supports their conclusion?Answer this question…
When a hypothesis has backing of experimental data, it is typically upgraded to a theory. This indicates that there is substantial evidence to support the hypothesis and that it has withstood extensive testing and scrutiny.
When collecting experimental data.