No, a hypothesis is not based on experimental data; rather, it is a proposed explanation or prediction that can be tested through experimentation. It is formulated based on observations, prior knowledge, or existing theories. Once experiments are conducted, the data collected can support or refute the hypothesis. Thus, while a hypothesis guides the experimental process, it is not derived from experimental data itself.
Is an explanation based on many observations supported by experimental results
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.
Among other things, it must be based on reliable data and repeatable experimental results.
An educated guess on the results of an experiment based on observation and the hypothesis is called a prediction. It is formed by analyzing existing information and using it to anticipate the outcome of the experiment. Predictions are essential for guiding the experimental process and can help validate or refute the hypothesis.
An experimental question is a question that can be answered through scientific investigation and experimentation. It typically focuses on exploring the relationship between variables or testing a hypothesis to draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. Experimental questions are specific, testable, and help guide the research process.
Is an explanation based on many observations supported by experimental results
The null hypothesis is an hypothesis about some population parameter. The goal of hypothesis testing is to check the viability of the null hypothesis in the light of experimental data. Based on the data, the null hypothesis either will or will not be rejected as a viable possibility.
the difference between discovery science and experimental science is. when we say "discovery science" is comes from the word itself "discovered" it is first discovered by a certain person. when we say "experimental" it comes from the word it self "experiment", people tried to make things that are new . :)
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.
Among other things, it must be based on reliable data and repeatable experimental results.
An educated guess on the results of an experiment based on observation and the hypothesis is called a prediction. It is formed by analyzing existing information and using it to anticipate the outcome of the experiment. Predictions are essential for guiding the experimental process and can help validate or refute the hypothesis.
A scientific hypothesis is testable, falsifiable, and based on empirical evidence. It must be formulated in a way that allows it to be disproven through experimentation or observation, making it a key component of the scientific method.
No, a hypothesis is not always supported by research findings. In scientific inquiry, a hypothesis is a testable prediction that can be confirmed or refuted based on experimental or observational data. Results may support the hypothesis, lead to its rejection, or indicate that the hypothesis needs to be revised or refined. The process of testing hypotheses is fundamental to advancing knowledge in science.
Hypothesis.
Reporting experimental results honestly, even if they contradict your hypothesis, is crucial for the integrity of scientific research. It allows for transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy in the scientific community. By reporting all results, regardless of whether they support the hypothesis, it helps prevent bias and ensures that knowledge is advanced based on sound evidence.