Among other things, it must be based on reliable data and repeatable experimental results.
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
A hypothesis must include a clear, testable statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables. It should be specific enough to be measurable and formulated based on existing knowledge or observations. Additionally, a good hypothesis often includes an independent variable (the cause) and a dependent variable (the effect).
You are from Kerr. The answer is on the textbook. The analysis does support the hypothesis because some of the offspring's genotype is heterozygous, as they have two different alleles. They do not have the recessive traits expressed, except in organisms that are homozygous recessive. You're so welcome.
Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.
The blending hypothesis, but not the particulate hypothesis, maintained that after a mating, the genetic material provided by each of the two parents is mixed in the offspring, losing its individual identity.
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.
A pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain is incomplete dominance, where the heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes. This contradicts the blending hypothesis, which suggests that the traits of the parents are mixed together in the offspring. In incomplete dominance, the traits remain distinct in the offspring.
Traits and Context
Her hypothesis must be testable.
The blending hypothesis of inheritance suggests that traits from two parents blend together in the offspring, resulting in intermediate characteristics. This idea has been largely discredited in favor of Mendel's principles of independent assortment and segregation, which describe how traits are inherited through discrete units called genes.
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
The two words that need to be in a hypothesis are IF and THEN.
A hypothesis must include a clear, testable statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables. It should be specific enough to be measurable and formulated based on existing knowledge or observations. Additionally, a good hypothesis often includes an independent variable (the cause) and a dependent variable (the effect).
null
what are the two solutions traits what are the two solutions traits