answersLogoWhite

0

Among other things, it must be based on reliable data and repeatable experimental results.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Science

In order to be considered scientific a hypothesis must be?

It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.


Which two of the following characteristics must a hypothesis posess in order for it to considered scientific?

A hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable to be considered scientific. This means it should be formulated in a way that allows for empirical testing through observation or experimentation, and it must be structured so that it can potentially be proven wrong. These characteristics ensure that the hypothesis can be evaluated objectively and contributes to the scientific method.


What characteristics must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?

To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.


What must an hypothesis include?

A hypothesis must include a clear, testable statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables. It should be specific enough to be measurable and formulated based on existing knowledge or observations. Additionally, a good hypothesis often includes an independent variable (the cause) and a dependent variable (the effect).


Does your analysis support or refute mendels hypothesis of dominant and recessive inheritance?

You are from Kerr. The answer is on the textbook. The analysis does support the hypothesis because some of the offspring's genotype is heterozygous, as they have two different alleles. They do not have the recessive traits expressed, except in organisms that are homozygous recessive. You're so welcome.

Related Questions

How is Mendel's particulate hypothesis is different from the blending hypothesis of inheritance?

The blending hypothesis, but not the particulate hypothesis, maintained that after a mating, the genetic material provided by each of the two parents is mixed in the offspring, losing its individual identity.


In order to be considered scientific a hypothesis must be?

It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.


Which two of the following characteristic must a hypothesis possess in order to be considered to be scientific?

A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.


How do you describe a pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain?

A pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain is incomplete dominance, where the heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes. This contradicts the blending hypothesis, which suggests that the traits of the parents are mixed together in the offspring. In incomplete dominance, the traits remain distinct in the offspring.


Annette has been instructed by her chemistry teacher to form a hypothesis about whether two solutions will form a precipitate if they are mixed together?

Her hypothesis must be testable.


Characters must have two things before they can act?

Traits and Context


What is the blending hypothesis of inheritance?

The blending hypothesis of inheritance suggests that traits from two parents blend together in the offspring, resulting in intermediate characteristics. This idea has been largely discredited in favor of Mendel's principles of independent assortment and segregation, which describe how traits are inherited through discrete units called genes.


Which two of the following characteristics must a hypothesis posess in order for it to considered scientific?

A hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable to be considered scientific. This means it should be formulated in a way that allows for empirical testing through observation or experimentation, and it must be structured so that it can potentially be proven wrong. These characteristics ensure that the hypothesis can be evaluated objectively and contributes to the scientific method.


What characteristics must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?

To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.


What are the two words that should be in your hypothesis?

The two words that need to be in a hypothesis are IF and THEN.


What must an hypothesis include?

A hypothesis must include a clear, testable statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables. It should be specific enough to be measurable and formulated based on existing knowledge or observations. Additionally, a good hypothesis often includes an independent variable (the cause) and a dependent variable (the effect).


What is the difference between two source hypothesis and two gospel hypothesis?

null