0
Among other things, it must be based on reliable data and repeatable experimental results.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In order to be considered scientific a hypothesis must be?
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
What characteristics must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
Explain how Mendel's particulate hypothesis is different from the blending hypothesis of inheritance?
Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.
Does your analysis support or refute mendels hypothesis of dominant and recessive inheritance?
You are from Kerr. The answer is on the textbook. The analysis does support the hypothesis because some of the offspring's genotype is heterozygous, as they have two different alleles. They do not have the recessive traits expressed, except in organisms that are homozygous recessive. You're so welcome.
What if hypothesis is not supporter by the data has been collected and analyzed?
When a hypothesis is not supported by data, two possibilities exist. The hypothesis can either be rejected and a new one is formulated, or more data is required to retest the hypothesis.
In order to be considered scientific a hypothesis must be?
It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.
Which two of the following characteristic must a hypothesis possess in order to be considered to be scientific?
A hypothesis must possess capable of being proven false and testable in order to be considered to be scientific.
Characters must have two things before they can act?
Traits and Context
What are two sentences for the word viable?
"The terms of this contract are not viable." "There are two viable options here: take it or leave."
Annette has been instructed by her chemistry teacher to form a hypothesis about whether two solutions will form a precipitate if they are mixed together?
Her hypothesis must be testable.
What characteristics must a hypothesis have to be considered scientific?
To make your hypothesis considered scientific it must have testable and measurable results. Example: If you do an experiment and the results are testable and measurable another person would be able to do the exact same project and come out with the same results.
What are the two words that should be in your hypothesis?
The two words that need to be in a hypothesis are IF and THEN.
The two main solution traits?
what are the two solutions traits what are the two solutions traits
What is the difference between two source hypothesis and two gospel hypothesis?
null
What are two possible outcomes to prove an experiments hypothesis?
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
Explain how Mendel's particulate hypothesis is different from the blending hypothesis of inheritance?
Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.
Does your analysis support or refute mendels hypothesis of dominant and recessive inheritance?
You are from Kerr. The answer is on the textbook. The analysis does support the hypothesis because some of the offspring's genotype is heterozygous, as they have two different alleles. They do not have the recessive traits expressed, except in organisms that are homozygous recessive. You're so welcome.
