Here, by the plural " laws" I assume that you mean the various, individual laws embodied in the forms of law, e.g., codes rules, regulations, and case law. The broader "law" on the other hand is the combination of all "laws" - it is the enforceable governmental norm that is always valid.
"Code" (or statute) for example, is one source of law, and the various code provisions may be called "laws." Other "laws" in the United States are found in regulations (rules passed in response to code by administrative agencies, e.g., through notice and comment), and binding judicial precedent ("case law"). There's also the law that comes from the nation's founding document, like the United States Constitution.
In practice, there is little difference between these sources of law. All of them can be binding and enforceable. However, there's also a hierarchy of the sources of law, which can change exactly how enforceable each one is. For example, the United States Code cannot overturn anything in the United States Constitution, and Agency Rules and Regulations cannot change anything in the United States Code. Finally, judicial precedent only seeks to clarify the impact and meaning of the Constitution, Code, and Regulations, and cannot change the Code itself unless it violates the Constitution, or the Regulations unless they violate the Code.
The essential difference between "laws" and "law" then, is that "the law" is always valid and enforceable, whereas individual "laws" might be INVALID or UNENFORCEABLE (e.g., if a law passed by Congress is unconstitutional).
The laws and legislation of these countries differ, as do the rules of jurisprudence. You need to be more specific.
There were just laws so they differ from the from law king after king had.
Every country has their own laws. Some of these laws vary greatly from the laws of the United States, in some countries the punishment for stealing is the loss of your hand, whereas in the United States, the punishment is fines and jail time.
The laws and legislation of these countries differ, as do the rules of jurisprudence. You need to be more specific.
The laws and legislation of these countries differ, as do the rules of jurisprudence. You need to be more specific.
The laws pertaining to unmotorized vehicles differ from state to state and in some communities.
The form of law that includes laws enacted by legislatures at the state and federal level, as well as those enacted by local governments, is known as statutory law. Statutory laws are written laws that are formally codified and passed by governing bodies. They differ from common law, which is based on judicial decisions and precedents. Statutory laws can address a wide range of issues, including criminal, civil, and administrative matters.
Workers compensation laws differ from country to country. The laws for hospitals do not differ very much from the workers compensation laws for other businesses.
The state laws differ so you have to add what state you are in. If 16 is the age of consent there's no problem though.
because i a theory is someones idea of what happend, that is debaitable with many diffrent ideas. but a scientific law is what is it.
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''
law is just one law but laws is two or more laws.