because i a theory is someones idea of what happend, that is debaitable with many diffrent ideas. but a scientific law is what is it.
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
One way scientific theories and scientific laws are similar is that both are based on extensive observation and experimentation and are fundamental to understanding the natural world. However, they differ in that scientific laws describe consistent, universal relationships observed in nature (like the law of gravity), while scientific theories provide explanations for those observations and can encompass broader concepts (like the theory of evolution).
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
This is a scientific law. Theories explain (or attempt to explain) laws.
you in a science class with a woman as your teacher and her name starts with c to m
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
A scientific law is a statement that describes what scientists expect to happen every time under a particular set of conditions. Unlike a theory, a scientific law describes an observed pattern without attempting to explain it.
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Laws are statements or descriptions of observable phenomena that have been repeatedly confirmed and are accepted as true. Theories, on the other hand, explain why these laws hold true by providing a framework of understanding and predicting natural phenomena. In essence, laws describe what happens, while theories explain why and how it happens.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
Scientific laws describe regular patterns or relationships in nature, but they do not explain why these patterns occur. Laws are empirical generalizations based on repeated observations and experiments. Theories are what provide the explanatory framework for why these patterns or relationships exist.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all