answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, they are quite different. The deuterium-tritium reaction produces a helium nucleus, which is harmless. There will be an intense neutron bombardment of the enclosure holding the fusion plasma, and this will result in the structure becoming radioactive, but that will be a problem for decommissioning rather than operation.

Scientists originally promised fusion as a clean source of energy, and whilst it is not entirely so, it is far cleaner than fission. The only problem is finding how to make it work in a practical power producing plant.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The waste products of fusion are mostly made up of radiologically inert isotopes of Helium. There are some concerns about waste, however. One is that some amount of radioactive tritium is very likely to escape from the process, and get into the environment. Another is that the equipment in the area of the reactor will become radioactive because of its exposure to neutrons, and this means it will have to be disposed of as a radioactive hazard when it is decommissioned. The time this waste is dangerous is said to be about three hundred years.

By contrast, fission produces both low-level nuclear waste, similar to the waste of the fusion reactor, though in much greater quantity, and high-level nuclear waste, which the fusion reactor will not produce at all. The high-level nuclear waste is highly radioactive, and will continue to be dangerous for over a million years.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The fuel in fusion (deuterium plus tritium) is transformed into helium, so that is the main waste product. I don't know if a working power plant would try to collect this or just expel it to atmosphere. Apart from that, there will be radioactive isotopes formed in the material surrounding the reaction chamber, which will receive an intense neutron bombardment, and will in fact be the source of thermal energy, transferring this to a coolant. This is as far as I know an unexplained part of the plant, so I'm not sure if this material will last the life of the plant or have to be renewed at intervals, in which case it will become a waste product and will have to be carefully stored, though I guess it won't be as active as fission products from a fission reactor.

In nuclear fission reactors you get a range of fission products some of which are highly active and have long half lives. The fusion reactor material will become activated but what results will depend on precisely what material is used.

Suggest you look at the Wikipedia article on ITER for the most up to date ideas on what a fusion plant might look like.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Fission waste products:

  • fission products - radioactive, mostly short lived beta and gamma emitters
  • neutron activated materials - radioactive, mostly beta and gamma emitters
  • unburned fissionable material - radioactive, long lived alpha emitters

Fusion waste products:

  • fusion products - mostly non-radioactive helium
  • neutron activated materials - radioactive, mostly beta and gamma emitters
  • unburned fusionable material - non-radioactive deuterium and radioactive tritium, short lived beta emitter

The worst in both cases are the neutron activated materials, as these are parts of the reactor structure itself. The others can be removed from the reactor and reprocessed to separate them for disposal or reuse. To separate out the neutron activated materials you would first have to completely dismantle the reactor!

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Fusion is a process in which the nuclei of two atoms combine to form a larger nucleus, while fission during fusion a small fraction of the reactant mass is converted into energy.

While not the only possible fusion reaction, the most commonly known is the fusion of hydrogen to create helium. The product is stable. In contrast, when fission of uranium or plutonium takes place, the resultant nuclei are neutron heavy and therefore will almost certainly be radioactive.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

I found the website K1 Project very helpful. They had several articles underneath their Learn/Energy tab which should answer any questions about nuclear fusion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

1 separates[fissin] the other fuses[fushin]

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The waste product of nuclear fusion is helium, an inert gas and not radioactive. The waste products of nuclear fission reactions are radioactive.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do the waste products of nuclear fusion differ from nuclear fission?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do nuclear fusion differ fundamentally from nuclear fission?

Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.


How nuclear fusion differ to nuclear fission in terms of energy release?

Energy from nuclear fusion is around 400 times more than that of nuclear fission for same mass.


Why is nuclear fusion less harmful than a nuclear fission?

Lack (or reduced) fission products. Fission products emit most of the harmful radiation in fallout.


How do the products of a fusion differ from the products of a fission reaction?

One thing that makes fusion products different from fission products obviously is the fact that fusion products are heavier than the original two nuclei and fission products are lighter than the original nucleus


How nuclear fusion and nuclear fission differ in terms of environmental hazards?

Nuclear fission involves splitting an atom and creates radioactive waste. Nuclear fusion involves bringing an atom together and creates no radiative waste


What is the benefit of nuclear fusion and What is one thing nuclear fission and nuclear fusion have in common?

nuclear fusion make more energy and they both make energy and have waste products


Outline on nuclear energy?

Definition: energy from nuclear fission or fusion: the energy released by nuclear fission or fusion


Is it a fission or fusion reaction?

Fission and fusion are different nuclear reactions.


Why no fission on sun?

The Sun get it power by nuclear FUSION not by nuclear fission.


How does nuclear fusion differ fundamentally from nuclear fission?

nuclear fusion is when two atoms are forced together, fusing their nuclei into a heavier element and releasing a large amount of energy. Fission is when an atom is broken up into smaller atoms releasing a large amount of energy.


What causes lesser pollution - nuclear fission or fusion?

Nuclear fusion


What is the antonym of nuclear fusion?

Nuclear fission.